![]() |
Mount Munday (north aspect)*. Maybe I'll discover I'm related to these Mundays! |
Yesterday, to celebrate Father's Day on Saturday Night Genealogy Fun, Randy Seaver asked us to write about four generations of our fathers, going back to our great-great-grandfathers. I still have two men missing in that list: my paternal grandfather's biological father and his father. I've been searching for them since I determined through Y-DNA testing that Mr. Sellers was not my grandfather's biological father. And until yesterday, I had been calling that great-grandfather Mr. X.
But I have made progress! Just a day or two earlier, I was reviewing my father's DNA matches on Family Tree DNA, and I noticed something significant: Instead of only one match at 111 markers, there are now four. All four are named Mundy or a variant. When you add the man on GEDmatch who matched my father, that makes five named Mundy/Munday/etc. I call that a trend.
And so I decided to start calling my great-grandfather Mr. Mundy.
He has a name!
Today I spent some additional time looking around to see what else has happened since I had time to work on this particular problem.
One of the matches on Family Tree DNA has posted a family tree going back a few generations. I used that information to search FamilyTree on FamilySearch. FamilyTree is the big collaborative tree that everyone can contribute to and argue about. It's FamilySearch's attempt to create the family tree of the human race.
I realize that not all of the information on FamilyTree is reliable. Much of it has no sources, or the sources are a little sketchy. But I figured it couldn't hurt to see where it would take me.
It took me several generations back, eventually to a Nicholas Mundy said to be born about 1645, although no one seems to know where.
Coincidentally, one of the pieces of information on Family Tree DNA led me to a Munday surname study. And on that site, my father has been linked to the very same Nicholas Mundy based on my father's Y haplogroup and the research people have been doing.
There is a note on the site that my father's grandfather is still unknown and the connection of my father to the Nicholas Munday line is still a guess.
But that's still progress!
One of the tasks I had set for myself in researching the best possibility I have found so far for my grandfather's biological father is to order that man's divorce file, just to see if there is any information in it that can help. I guess I better get going on that!
*Photo by Andre Charland, April 3, 2005. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.
This is HUGE! Good work. You are amazing!
ReplyDeleteAnd I have a great cheering section!
DeleteNicholas Munday and his descendants sound like interesting possibilities...were you able to find them on other trees, maybe Family Search? I hope the divorce file offers some promising clues!
ReplyDeleteFamilySearch is where I found him first. In fact, he's there twice (because that still happens), but only one has reasonable sources attached. And today I ask New Jersey about the divorce file!
DeleteCongratulations on your progress. Yeah for Mr. Mundy!
ReplyDeleteThank you, Lisa! Sometimes stubbornness pays off.
DeleteThis is a BIG breakthrough. Thankful enough have tested so the match is gradually emerging. Keep up the good work. 🤗
ReplyDeleteI'm so excited! Now if I could get that kind of breakthrough on finding the son my aunt gave up for adoption, but that requires enough to test . . . .
Delete