George Ella Lyon, the 2015–2016 Kentucky State Poet Laureate, wrote the original "Where I'm From" poem in 1993 after being inspired by a poem in Stories I Ain't Told Nobody Yet. The idea is to write about the people, places, and things that have influenced you and your life. As a writing exercise, the idea has continued to inspire others and has been used around the world. Lyon has said, "Its life beyond my notebook is a testimony to the power of poetry, of roots, and of teachers."
For Saturday Night Genealogy Fun one week in November 2015, Randy Seaver suggested his readers write a poem for the "Where I'm From" contest being held by Lisa Louise Cooke of Genealogy Gems. I wrote a poem and posted it on my blog. I also submitted it to the Genealogy Gems contest (and won a premium subscription).
The exercise of writing a "Where I'm From" poem is still popular with many genealogical societies. The Santa Clara County (California) Historical and Genealogical Society (SCCHGS) currently has its own project for would-be poets and would love to hear from more people. It isn't really a contest, as the poems will not be judged. Everyone who submits a poem will receive a small gift and have their names put into a drawing for prizes, which include cash and a year's subscription to MyHeritage.com. Those who mention Santa Clara County by name or an identifiable landmark in
Santa Clara County in their memory poems will be entered into an additional drawing.
If your interest has been piqued, more details about the project can be found here. Drawings for prizes will take place at the SCCHGS meeting on October 18. To be eligible for the drawings, you need to submit your poem by August 31, 2016.
Genealogy is like a jigsaw puzzle, but you don't have the box top, so you don't know what the picture is supposed to look like. As you start putting the puzzle together, you realize some pieces are missing, and eventually you figure out that some of the pieces you started with don't actually belong to this puzzle. I'll help you discover the right pieces for your puzzle and assemble them into a picture of your family.
Showing posts with label SCCHGS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SCCHGS. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 20, 2016
Thursday, June 23, 2011
"Online Newspapers" Talk at SCCHGS
On Tuesday evening I gave a presentation on using online newspapers for genealogy research to the Santa Clara County Historical and Genealogical Society. It was the largest group I've spoken to so far -- 75 people! Everyone was enthusiastic about the information, and many people were optimistic they would be able to use it to help find their relatives in the paper. I had a wonderful time, and the cookies made with peanut butter cups were especially delicious. Many thanks to Richard Ferman for inviting me to speak!
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Genealogy Seminar and "Who Do You Think You Are?"
Saturday was the second day of the Santa Clara County Historical and Genealogical Society and California State Genealogical Alliance weekend. About 175 people from all over the Bay Area attended the meeting at the Santa Clara LDS church. The presentations were "Land: Digging Deeper Online and Off" by Cath Madden Trindle, CG (stepping in at the last minute for Melinda Kashuba, who was not able to come), "Courthouse Records in Cyberspace" by Junel Davidsen, CG, "I Wish I Had Asked: A Guide to Doing Oral History Interviews" by Peggy Rossi, and "Spreadsheets in Genealogy" by Cat Nielsen.
Cath gave a broad overview of the different types of land records that exist, which types are likely to be found in which states, a glimpse into what can be found online, and archives in other countries. Junel gave an online tour of several sites that have indices and actual downloadable scans of court records. Her main point was that many government offices currently have records online, and more are likely to do so in the future, except in California. Peggy outlined a series of steps to follow if you want to do oral history interviews with family members. She explained the steps clearly, and I was happy to hear her emphasize the importance of transcribing the interviews and sharing them with other family members. Cat talked about the utility of spreadsheets in analyzing information you have collected in your research. She showed examples of spreadsheets with census data, city directory information, timelines, and studying all people with one surname in a given location. While I learned something from each speaker, I think I enjoyed Cat's talk the most. She had everyone laughing many times, and her tweaks on what you can do with spreadsheets gave me some good ideas.
After I returned home, I finally was able to watch the Vanessa Williams episode of Who Do You Think You Are? that I missed Friday night. I enjoyed it quite a bit, especially the tintype of her great-great-grandfather in his service file at the National Archives (I have to wonder if that was planted; I'm not saying it was, just that I wonder). Both of the stories the producers chose to follow in her family were compelling and interesting. But I'm confused by some of Dick Eastman's comments on the episode in his post of February 4. He said he felt that Vanessa Williams was doing the research herself, instead of being fed information by professionals. Um, did I miss that in the episode? What I saw was the historian in Oyster Bay showing her the book with David Carll's enlistment and the land record, the archivist in D.C. showing her the already pulled service file of David Carll, the Civil War historian in South Carolina showing her around locations he had researched, the genealogist showing her the enlarged printout of the 1910 census with her family at the top of the page, the archivist at the Tennessee State Archives showing her the engraving and some information that had already been pulled, and ditto at the Nashville Public Library and the Shelby County Archives. The only thing Vanessa Williams did herself was look at the 1870 census on Ancestry.com (our obligatory product placement, specifically announced by Miss Williams herself before the screen shot).
Speaking of the Ancestry.com look-up, I have gotten in the habit of double-checking what they show on TV to see if I get the same results. I noticed that Miss Williams typed in "Carll" for the last name but that the census page showed "Carle" for the name. I tested it myself a few minutes ago. "Carll" will pull up the correct record, because both spellings are listed in the index. But while the census page says that David Carll was mulatto, the results page for David Carll in Oyster Bay said that he was white. Maybe Ancestry.com will correct that?
While I'm nitpicking, there were some interesting mathematical errors in the dialog. David Carll's enlistment record showed that he enlisted on January 3, 1864, and the Oyster Bay historian stated that blacks were allowed to enlist as of December 23, 1863 -- a difference of ten days. But the historian said that David Carll enlisted "within the week" after he could do so. Later, when they were looking at the record of Carll's land purchase, they said it was dated January 7, 1864, but Miss Williams said he bought the land five days later. The last time I checked, 7 - 3 = 4, not 5. Then when Miss Williams was looking at the 1870 census, she was musing to herself and said that David Carll was married before the war and enlisted for his family. The oldest child in the household is 3 years old, which means he was born about 1866-1867, i.e., after the war. Who is checking the continuity in the scripts on this show?
There was more, but I know -- it's entertainment. I shouldn't be taking it this seriously. It just seems that these are things that wouldn't be that difficult to catch, if someone was trying to do so. Being more accurate is considered a positive thing in genealogy; why can't it be that way in a show (supposedly) about genealogy?
Cath gave a broad overview of the different types of land records that exist, which types are likely to be found in which states, a glimpse into what can be found online, and archives in other countries. Junel gave an online tour of several sites that have indices and actual downloadable scans of court records. Her main point was that many government offices currently have records online, and more are likely to do so in the future, except in California. Peggy outlined a series of steps to follow if you want to do oral history interviews with family members. She explained the steps clearly, and I was happy to hear her emphasize the importance of transcribing the interviews and sharing them with other family members. Cat talked about the utility of spreadsheets in analyzing information you have collected in your research. She showed examples of spreadsheets with census data, city directory information, timelines, and studying all people with one surname in a given location. While I learned something from each speaker, I think I enjoyed Cat's talk the most. She had everyone laughing many times, and her tweaks on what you can do with spreadsheets gave me some good ideas.
After I returned home, I finally was able to watch the Vanessa Williams episode of Who Do You Think You Are? that I missed Friday night. I enjoyed it quite a bit, especially the tintype of her great-great-grandfather in his service file at the National Archives (I have to wonder if that was planted; I'm not saying it was, just that I wonder). Both of the stories the producers chose to follow in her family were compelling and interesting. But I'm confused by some of Dick Eastman's comments on the episode in his post of February 4. He said he felt that Vanessa Williams was doing the research herself, instead of being fed information by professionals. Um, did I miss that in the episode? What I saw was the historian in Oyster Bay showing her the book with David Carll's enlistment and the land record, the archivist in D.C. showing her the already pulled service file of David Carll, the Civil War historian in South Carolina showing her around locations he had researched, the genealogist showing her the enlarged printout of the 1910 census with her family at the top of the page, the archivist at the Tennessee State Archives showing her the engraving and some information that had already been pulled, and ditto at the Nashville Public Library and the Shelby County Archives. The only thing Vanessa Williams did herself was look at the 1870 census on Ancestry.com (our obligatory product placement, specifically announced by Miss Williams herself before the screen shot).
Speaking of the Ancestry.com look-up, I have gotten in the habit of double-checking what they show on TV to see if I get the same results. I noticed that Miss Williams typed in "Carll" for the last name but that the census page showed "Carle" for the name. I tested it myself a few minutes ago. "Carll" will pull up the correct record, because both spellings are listed in the index. But while the census page says that David Carll was mulatto, the results page for David Carll in Oyster Bay said that he was white. Maybe Ancestry.com will correct that?
While I'm nitpicking, there were some interesting mathematical errors in the dialog. David Carll's enlistment record showed that he enlisted on January 3, 1864, and the Oyster Bay historian stated that blacks were allowed to enlist as of December 23, 1863 -- a difference of ten days. But the historian said that David Carll enlisted "within the week" after he could do so. Later, when they were looking at the record of Carll's land purchase, they said it was dated January 7, 1864, but Miss Williams said he bought the land five days later. The last time I checked, 7 - 3 = 4, not 5. Then when Miss Williams was looking at the 1870 census, she was musing to herself and said that David Carll was married before the war and enlisted for his family. The oldest child in the household is 3 years old, which means he was born about 1866-1867, i.e., after the war. Who is checking the continuity in the scripts on this show?
There was more, but I know -- it's entertainment. I shouldn't be taking it this seriously. It just seems that these are things that wouldn't be that difficult to catch, if someone was trying to do so. Being more accurate is considered a positive thing in genealogy; why can't it be that way in a show (supposedly) about genealogy?
Friday, February 4, 2011
Busy Genealogy Weekend
| The New York Evening Call |
Thursday I was at the Oakland Public Library studying Socialist newspapers from 1911, looking for information about a young woman who died due to the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire. What I was hoping to find was mention of a family member, because while I'm pretty sure the girl who died is the same as the person in the family I am researching, I want better documentation than what I currently have. Unfortunately, as can often happen in genealogy, the hoped-for information wasn't there. I'm starting to run out of places to look.
Friday was the first day of a two-day meeting organized by the Santa Clara County Historical and Genealogical Society and the California State Genealogical Alliance. CSGA had a combined board and annual meeting in the morning, and in the afternoon attendees received a tour of the genealogy collection at the Santa Clara (City) Central Park Library, where the meeting was held. SCCHGS has an arrangement with the library and houses its collection there, and the library also has genealogy books and periodicals. Local History Librarian Mary Hanel gave our group an overview of the collection, which has a strong focus on Santa Clara County and California. The collection includes such things as microfilms of San Jose funeral home books, aerial photos of Santa Clara, high school yearbooks, and township atlases. It is an excellent resource, and the library and SCCHGS both have online indices and databases. While I was at the library I applied for a library card, and now I can use the database of the historical San Jose Mercury News from the comfort of my home.
Friday night, of course, was the first episode of the second season of Who Do You Think You Are? -- which I missed. I had an appointment that had been shuffled around during the week, and finally ended up at 8:00 p.m. on Friday. The good news is that I'll be able to catch up (I was hoping tonight, but no luck so far) online, because NBC has been posting all the episodes. I hope everyone else enjoyed it!
Saturday is the second day of the SCCHGS/CSGA weekend, which will be at the Santa Clara Family History Center. We'll have presentations on land records, courthouse records, oral history interviews, and using spreadsheets in genealogy. And Sunday I'll be in Vallejo, leading a genealogy group there.
Wouldn't it be great to have this much genealogy all the time?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


