Genealogy is like a jigsaw puzzle, but you don't have the box top, so you don't know what the picture is supposed to look like. As you start putting the puzzle together, you realize some pieces are missing, and eventually you figure out that some of the pieces you started with don't actually belong to this puzzle. I'll help you discover the right pieces for your puzzle and assemble them into a picture of your family.
Showing posts with label Ohio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ohio. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 17, 2025
Thursday, September 12, 2024
Wednesday, September 15, 2021
Wednesday, September 11, 2019
Monday, July 29, 2019
IAJGS International Conference on Jewish Genealogy in Cleveland, Ohio
So here I am in lovely Cleveland, Ohio. I think it hit 89° today, with something like 90% humidity. I really, really hate weather like this. Then why have I come to Cleveland in July? For genealogy, obviously!
Yesterday (Sunday) was the first day of this year's IAJGS International Conference on Jewish Genealogy. It is the 39th conference, although it hasn't been held every year. Even though it is Cleveland in July, I can deal with that more than I could the expense of last year's conference in Warsaw, so I'm glad I am able to attend.
I unfortunately had a late start on Sunday, so I missed both of the morning sessions, which was very disappointing. I had particularly been looking forward to hearing Vivian Kahn's talk about Hungarian Jewish immigration into Cleveland, especially since both sides of her family lived there. I did have an enjoyable time walking through the exhibitor hall, visiting vendors and many research groups that had tables for the afternoon. The highlight of the day was the keynote address by Daniel Goldmark, Director of the Center for Popular Music Studies at Case Western Reserve University. His presentation was about Jews in popular music, ranging from Sophie Tucker and Al Jolson to the Beastie Boys, Gene Simmons, and more. He sometimes regretted playing snippets of songs, as most people in the audience started singing along almost immediately. It might not have been the most genealogically oriented keynote I've heard at a conference, but it sure was fun!
I wrapped up the day with a meeting of Jewish genealogical society newsletter and journal editors. I always try to schedule one for the conferences I attend. This year we had six people representing five societies (and two people were unable to attend but spoke to me about the meeting). As usual, it was a combination of networking, brainstorming, and kvetching. There's still one society that does print only, with no electronic version of their publication.
Monday began with the first of my three presentations. I was so happy that the first session of the day began at 9:15, instead of 7:30, as it was at one conference! The topic was "Jewish Genealogy: How Is This Research Different from All Other Research?" Rather than being an introduction to genealogy, it focuses on the aspects of Jewish research that are unique and different from researching other groups. About 50 people were in attendance, which was nice to see. One of the attendees was a lovely woman who has been researching her family for 40 years but only recently discovered she has a Jewish line. She and several others told me at the end that the talk was very helpful and informative, which I am always gratified to hear.
I went to the Belarus Special Interest Group meeting because the well known Miriam Weiner was scheduled to be the presenter. I've never heard her speak before, so I don't know if today was surprising or not, but all she did was show how to use the Routes to Roots site. On the positive side, I did get a copy of a 1937 map of Grodno, which will be helpful for research.
IAJGS offered its mentoring program again this year, where they ask speakers to volunteer some time to help attendees with research questions. The mentoring area is really cramped this year, with a small number of tables and lots of volunteers, but I found a table with two attendees who came up with lots of questions for me. They have several new avenues of research to work on now.
I was able to fit one DNA talk into my schedule. It's the first time I've heard Bennett Greenspan of Family Tree DNA talk. He is an entertaining speaker, even on the (somewhat boring) technical aspects of Y-DNA that were his topic. I'm not sure if what I learned is going to necessarily help me in my research, but I do understand how the matches work much better.
For some local flavor (since I missed Vivian's talk), I next went to a session on the Jewish presence in central Ohio. The presenters discussed Jewish immigration into the area beginning in the 1830's and going through Soviet Jewish immigration late in the 20th century, and showed images of many documents and artifacts held at Ohio History Connection and the Columbus Jewish Historical Society, including a mohel's record book covering 1873 to 1904. Both repositories hold a wide range of items that would be helpful and beneficial to many genealogists researching their families.
Today ended with a get-together of professional genealogists who are at the conference. We introduced ourselves, talked about our research specialties, and did a lot of networking. One of the few (I think there are two?) Jewish Certified Genealogists was actually in attendance. One topic that came up was how it would be beneficial for attendees at the IAJGS conference if there were more sessions on methods and foundational topics, rather than everthing being focused on Jewish genealogical topics. It has been learned over the years that few people who attend IAJGS go to general conferences where they would learn more about those other topics.
My commentary on days 3 and 4 of the conference is here, and that on days 5 and 6 here.
Yesterday (Sunday) was the first day of this year's IAJGS International Conference on Jewish Genealogy. It is the 39th conference, although it hasn't been held every year. Even though it is Cleveland in July, I can deal with that more than I could the expense of last year's conference in Warsaw, so I'm glad I am able to attend.
I unfortunately had a late start on Sunday, so I missed both of the morning sessions, which was very disappointing. I had particularly been looking forward to hearing Vivian Kahn's talk about Hungarian Jewish immigration into Cleveland, especially since both sides of her family lived there. I did have an enjoyable time walking through the exhibitor hall, visiting vendors and many research groups that had tables for the afternoon. The highlight of the day was the keynote address by Daniel Goldmark, Director of the Center for Popular Music Studies at Case Western Reserve University. His presentation was about Jews in popular music, ranging from Sophie Tucker and Al Jolson to the Beastie Boys, Gene Simmons, and more. He sometimes regretted playing snippets of songs, as most people in the audience started singing along almost immediately. It might not have been the most genealogically oriented keynote I've heard at a conference, but it sure was fun!
I wrapped up the day with a meeting of Jewish genealogical society newsletter and journal editors. I always try to schedule one for the conferences I attend. This year we had six people representing five societies (and two people were unable to attend but spoke to me about the meeting). As usual, it was a combination of networking, brainstorming, and kvetching. There's still one society that does print only, with no electronic version of their publication.
Monday began with the first of my three presentations. I was so happy that the first session of the day began at 9:15, instead of 7:30, as it was at one conference! The topic was "Jewish Genealogy: How Is This Research Different from All Other Research?" Rather than being an introduction to genealogy, it focuses on the aspects of Jewish research that are unique and different from researching other groups. About 50 people were in attendance, which was nice to see. One of the attendees was a lovely woman who has been researching her family for 40 years but only recently discovered she has a Jewish line. She and several others told me at the end that the talk was very helpful and informative, which I am always gratified to hear.
I went to the Belarus Special Interest Group meeting because the well known Miriam Weiner was scheduled to be the presenter. I've never heard her speak before, so I don't know if today was surprising or not, but all she did was show how to use the Routes to Roots site. On the positive side, I did get a copy of a 1937 map of Grodno, which will be helpful for research.
IAJGS offered its mentoring program again this year, where they ask speakers to volunteer some time to help attendees with research questions. The mentoring area is really cramped this year, with a small number of tables and lots of volunteers, but I found a table with two attendees who came up with lots of questions for me. They have several new avenues of research to work on now.
I was able to fit one DNA talk into my schedule. It's the first time I've heard Bennett Greenspan of Family Tree DNA talk. He is an entertaining speaker, even on the (somewhat boring) technical aspects of Y-DNA that were his topic. I'm not sure if what I learned is going to necessarily help me in my research, but I do understand how the matches work much better.
For some local flavor (since I missed Vivian's talk), I next went to a session on the Jewish presence in central Ohio. The presenters discussed Jewish immigration into the area beginning in the 1830's and going through Soviet Jewish immigration late in the 20th century, and showed images of many documents and artifacts held at Ohio History Connection and the Columbus Jewish Historical Society, including a mohel's record book covering 1873 to 1904. Both repositories hold a wide range of items that would be helpful and beneficial to many genealogists researching their families.
Today ended with a get-together of professional genealogists who are at the conference. We introduced ourselves, talked about our research specialties, and did a lot of networking. One of the few (I think there are two?) Jewish Certified Genealogists was actually in attendance. One topic that came up was how it would be beneficial for attendees at the IAJGS conference if there were more sessions on methods and foundational topics, rather than everthing being focused on Jewish genealogical topics. It has been learned over the years that few people who attend IAJGS go to general conferences where they would learn more about those other topics.
My commentary on days 3 and 4 of the conference is here, and that on days 5 and 6 here.
Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Wednesday, June 12, 2019
Tuesday, December 5, 2017
The Season of Giving: Cairo Genizah, Dachau Survivors, Polish Films, and More
I've come across several more genealogically oriented projects that are looking for assistance. While you consider which seasonal toy drive you might want to contribute to, also think about how you can help with your time, knowledge, or family items.
Scribes of the Cairo Geniza is a project to sort, transcribe, and translate the fragments of documents discovered in the Cairo Genizah. During phase I of the project, volunteers will sort fragments into different categories based on their script types, which offers clues to the type of text a fragment contains. Having this information for the entire collection will allow the fragments to be sorted into workflows for transcription in phase II (launching in Spring 2018).
The results from Scribes of the Cairo Geniza have the potential to rewrite the history of the premodern Middle East, Mediterranean and Indian Ocean trade, and the Jewish diaspora. Until now, most of the information has remained locked away in undeciphered manuscript fragments; less than one third of the 350,000 items have been catalogued in the years that the cache has been known to exist. Virtually all scholars who have studied these texts have come away with a transformed sense of the history of the region and the long ties of intimacy among its people. Students and the general public will have the opportunity to benefit from encountering these fragments online and from learning how to sort and eventually transcribe them as members of a citizen scientist community. This project is a way for people with shared interests and different skill levels from around the world to meet in a common endeavor and unlock this storage chamber of ancient fragments.
If you or a relative spent any time in Kitchener Camp, a Jewish refugee camp in Sandwich, Kent, United Kingdom, immediately before or during World War II, the organizers of a site are seeking photos, memories, etc. The intention is to establish the site and then find an institution to maintain it as a memorial. More information can be found on the Web site, http://www.kitchenercamp.co.uk/.
The Port Hope Archives ((Northumberland County, Ontario, Canada) is asking for help in identifying soldiers and civilians iin its collection of photographs relating to World War I and World War II. The primary focus was in connction with this year's Remembrance Day (Veterans Day here in the United States), but the archives continues to receive photos and welcomes any efforts to name the people in them.
Judith Ellen Elam is in charge of bringing an exhibit titled "The German Roots of Zionism" to Maui, Hawaii. It will be on display for three months at the local Nisei Veterans Memorial Center, probably starting in August 2018. Her group is trying to tie the exhibit in with a Hawaiian-Japanese theme as well. The 522nd Field Artillery Battalion was activated February 1, 1943 at Camp Shelby, Mississippi as part of the 442nd Regimental Combat Team. The unit was composed of both mainland and Hawaiian Japanese-Americans. It is best known for liberating some of the Dachau subcamps.
Judith would like to make contact with anyone who has personal information (documents, photos, testimonials, etc.) about Jews liberated from Dachau subcamps by the 522nd Field Artillery Battalion. The group would like to showcase the personal items in a display for the duration of the exhibit. Please contact Judith at elamj@hawaii.rr.com if you can assist her.
The Columbus (Ohio) Jewish Historical Society is collecting the names of Jewish central Ohio World War I veterans who served in the United States armed forces, as well as those who served in other countries but had a link to central Ohio. If your family had Jewish WWI veterans with a link to central Ohio, please contact Toby Brief at tbrief@hotmail.com or history@tcjf.org. The society has collected more than 230 names so far and knows that there are more to be added.
In another focused memorial effort relating to World War I, Flinders University in South Australia is seeking contributions toward a public event planned for February 23 and 24, 2018 in Adelaide. "South Australians in France" will bring together people with heirlooms and specialists of various types to discuss the stories behind those objects. The project has a Facebook page where photos can be posted leading up to next year's event.
Arizona State University has received a grant that will permit it to hold workshops over the next three years to teach state residents how to care for their fragile family heirlooms and artifacts. People will be able to digitize documents and will help build the state's community archive in the process. A specific effort is being made to reach out to the Latino, Asian, black, and LGBTQ communities to make sure their stories are saved.
The Quincentennial Foundation Museum of Turkish Jews in Istanbul is planning an exhibition on Jewish life in Trakya/Thrace. It will attempt to include all the localities, from Edirne to Gelibolu, including Tekirdag, Tchorlu, Silivri, Kirklareli (Kirk Kilise), Canakkale, Luleburgaz, etc. It will range from ancient days to the present time. The museum is asking for digital photos of people and artifacts, and stories for the exhibition. If you have something that might be of interest, contact Metin Delevi at metindelevi@gmail.com.
David Sandler is working on a book about South African landsmanschaftn (sick and benefit societies) which will incorporate all brochures and booklets of societies he can obtain. So far he has booklets from Keidan, Krakenowo, Ponevez and Malat and Districts. Many associations were active in South Africa over the years, including ones related to Anykster, Birzer, Dwinsk, Keidan, Kelmer, Kovno, Krakinover, Kroze, Kupisker, Kurland and Riga, Lutzin, Minsk, Ponevez, Poswohl, Plungian, Rakishok, Schavlaner, Schawler, Shater, Tels, Utianer, Wilner, and Zagare. The SAJBD archives at Beyachad are assisting David, but he is appealing to everyone for any publications from any of these South African societies. You can contact him at sedsand@iinet.net.au. Approximately 95% of the proceeds from David's books go to Arcadia (the JHB Chevra Kadisha) and the balance to Oranjia (CT) and the JDC.
Agata Zalewska is the Film Collection Manager for Filmoteka Narodowa, the Polish National Film Archives in Warsaw. As a state cultural institution, Filmoteka Narodowa is charged with protecting national cultural heritage in cinematography and dissemination of film culture. Since its inception in 1955, the archives has been collecting and restoring films made in Poland, with the hope of finding copies of all films. It has an almost complete collection of films made from 1946 onward. Of course, more early silent films are missing than later films.
Filmoteka Narodowa has restored 75% of Polish feature films made between 1930 and 1939. Besides films, it has extensive collections of promotional materials, books, posters, stills, and other materials related to films. It makes its items available in its library; though movie showings, festivals, and lending; and though the production of print and digital media. For example, it has published a DVD containing six restored shorts and an introduction about the early days of World War II for Poland, especially Warsaw; the DVD includes an English version with subtitles.
Agata’s primary interest at Filmoteka Narodowa is in finding missing Polish films. Although it has become harder and harder to find films, and in many ways it is a race against time, Filmoteka Narodowa keeps turning up a gem here and there. There is no telling where a film — full-length, documentary, or short — may be found. For instance, in the late 1990's, a 1929 film was found in the Royal Archives in Brussels, and in 2003 a 1914 film was purchased from Filmmuseum in Amsterdam. Others have been found in private collections stored away in attics and forgotten.
If you have any materials that would be of interest to Filmoteka Narodowa or know where any are or might be, please contact Abbey H. Brewer or Agata Zalewska.
Abbey H. Brewer
1422 E. Brooklake Drive
Houston, Texas 77077
USA
ahbrew1422@yahoo.com
(713) 882-7229
Agata Zalewska
Filmoteka Narodowa
ul. Puławska 61
00-975 Warszawa
POLAND
azalewska@fn.org.pl
(This information appeared in Gen Dobry! Volume XVIII, Number 5, May 2017.)
A Jewish Reform synagogue in London is looking for help in deciphering an amulet in its possession. The amulet was "dumped anonymously in the shul." While most of the Hebrew has been translated, the central letters are still a mystery. Anyone who has an idea as to the meaning is invited to contact the synagogue.
Scribes of the Cairo Geniza is a project to sort, transcribe, and translate the fragments of documents discovered in the Cairo Genizah. During phase I of the project, volunteers will sort fragments into different categories based on their script types, which offers clues to the type of text a fragment contains. Having this information for the entire collection will allow the fragments to be sorted into workflows for transcription in phase II (launching in Spring 2018).
The results from Scribes of the Cairo Geniza have the potential to rewrite the history of the premodern Middle East, Mediterranean and Indian Ocean trade, and the Jewish diaspora. Until now, most of the information has remained locked away in undeciphered manuscript fragments; less than one third of the 350,000 items have been catalogued in the years that the cache has been known to exist. Virtually all scholars who have studied these texts have come away with a transformed sense of the history of the region and the long ties of intimacy among its people. Students and the general public will have the opportunity to benefit from encountering these fragments online and from learning how to sort and eventually transcribe them as members of a citizen scientist community. This project is a way for people with shared interests and different skill levels from around the world to meet in a common endeavor and unlock this storage chamber of ancient fragments.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
If you or a relative spent any time in Kitchener Camp, a Jewish refugee camp in Sandwich, Kent, United Kingdom, immediately before or during World War II, the organizers of a site are seeking photos, memories, etc. The intention is to establish the site and then find an institution to maintain it as a memorial. More information can be found on the Web site, http://www.kitchenercamp.co.uk/.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
![]() |
| Marching Soldiers, 1916 |
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
Judith Ellen Elam is in charge of bringing an exhibit titled "The German Roots of Zionism" to Maui, Hawaii. It will be on display for three months at the local Nisei Veterans Memorial Center, probably starting in August 2018. Her group is trying to tie the exhibit in with a Hawaiian-Japanese theme as well. The 522nd Field Artillery Battalion was activated February 1, 1943 at Camp Shelby, Mississippi as part of the 442nd Regimental Combat Team. The unit was composed of both mainland and Hawaiian Japanese-Americans. It is best known for liberating some of the Dachau subcamps.
Judith would like to make contact with anyone who has personal information (documents, photos, testimonials, etc.) about Jews liberated from Dachau subcamps by the 522nd Field Artillery Battalion. The group would like to showcase the personal items in a display for the duration of the exhibit. Please contact Judith at elamj@hawaii.rr.com if you can assist her.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
The Columbus (Ohio) Jewish Historical Society is collecting the names of Jewish central Ohio World War I veterans who served in the United States armed forces, as well as those who served in other countries but had a link to central Ohio. If your family had Jewish WWI veterans with a link to central Ohio, please contact Toby Brief at tbrief@hotmail.com or history@tcjf.org. The society has collected more than 230 names so far and knows that there are more to be added.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
![]() |
| Australian soldiers in France, 1917 |
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
Arizona State University has received a grant that will permit it to hold workshops over the next three years to teach state residents how to care for their fragile family heirlooms and artifacts. People will be able to digitize documents and will help build the state's community archive in the process. A specific effort is being made to reach out to the Latino, Asian, black, and LGBTQ communities to make sure their stories are saved.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
The Quincentennial Foundation Museum of Turkish Jews in Istanbul is planning an exhibition on Jewish life in Trakya/Thrace. It will attempt to include all the localities, from Edirne to Gelibolu, including Tekirdag, Tchorlu, Silivri, Kirklareli (Kirk Kilise), Canakkale, Luleburgaz, etc. It will range from ancient days to the present time. The museum is asking for digital photos of people and artifacts, and stories for the exhibition. If you have something that might be of interest, contact Metin Delevi at metindelevi@gmail.com.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
David Sandler is working on a book about South African landsmanschaftn (sick and benefit societies) which will incorporate all brochures and booklets of societies he can obtain. So far he has booklets from Keidan, Krakenowo, Ponevez and Malat and Districts. Many associations were active in South Africa over the years, including ones related to Anykster, Birzer, Dwinsk, Keidan, Kelmer, Kovno, Krakinover, Kroze, Kupisker, Kurland and Riga, Lutzin, Minsk, Ponevez, Poswohl, Plungian, Rakishok, Schavlaner, Schawler, Shater, Tels, Utianer, Wilner, and Zagare. The SAJBD archives at Beyachad are assisting David, but he is appealing to everyone for any publications from any of these South African societies. You can contact him at sedsand@iinet.net.au. Approximately 95% of the proceeds from David's books go to Arcadia (the JHB Chevra Kadisha) and the balance to Oranjia (CT) and the JDC.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
Agata Zalewska is the Film Collection Manager for Filmoteka Narodowa, the Polish National Film Archives in Warsaw. As a state cultural institution, Filmoteka Narodowa is charged with protecting national cultural heritage in cinematography and dissemination of film culture. Since its inception in 1955, the archives has been collecting and restoring films made in Poland, with the hope of finding copies of all films. It has an almost complete collection of films made from 1946 onward. Of course, more early silent films are missing than later films.
Filmoteka Narodowa has restored 75% of Polish feature films made between 1930 and 1939. Besides films, it has extensive collections of promotional materials, books, posters, stills, and other materials related to films. It makes its items available in its library; though movie showings, festivals, and lending; and though the production of print and digital media. For example, it has published a DVD containing six restored shorts and an introduction about the early days of World War II for Poland, especially Warsaw; the DVD includes an English version with subtitles.
Agata’s primary interest at Filmoteka Narodowa is in finding missing Polish films. Although it has become harder and harder to find films, and in many ways it is a race against time, Filmoteka Narodowa keeps turning up a gem here and there. There is no telling where a film — full-length, documentary, or short — may be found. For instance, in the late 1990's, a 1929 film was found in the Royal Archives in Brussels, and in 2003 a 1914 film was purchased from Filmmuseum in Amsterdam. Others have been found in private collections stored away in attics and forgotten.
If you have any materials that would be of interest to Filmoteka Narodowa or know where any are or might be, please contact Abbey H. Brewer or Agata Zalewska.
Abbey H. Brewer
1422 E. Brooklake Drive
Houston, Texas 77077
USA
ahbrew1422@yahoo.com
(713) 882-7229
Agata Zalewska
Filmoteka Narodowa
ul. Puławska 61
00-975 Warszawa
POLAND
azalewska@fn.org.pl
(This information appeared in Gen Dobry! Volume XVIII, Number 5, May 2017.)
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
A Jewish Reform synagogue in London is looking for help in deciphering an amulet in its possession. The amulet was "dumped anonymously in the shul." While most of the Hebrew has been translated, the central letters are still a mystery. Anyone who has an idea as to the meaning is invited to contact the synagogue.
Wednesday, July 5, 2017
Hooray for Newspapers!
It's amazing how quickly time can get away from you. I knew it had been a while since I had posted the new additions to the Wikipedia newspaper archives page, but I didn't realize it had been eight months. That's obviously far too long. My only excuse is that I've been busy trying to move to Portland, Oregon, and it's amazing how much time it takes to do all the paperwork.
Lucky for us researchers, almost all of the newspapers added have free access. The exception is the Friedens Messenger, for which you need to be a paid member of the St. Louis Genealogical society.
• Hungary: Although the newspaper itself has closed down, the online archive of Népszabadság is being maintained for free access. I don't read Hungarian, however, and I can't figure out what years are covered.
• Korea (new country!): Yes, you read that right, Korea. Not North or South, but just plain old Korea. The National Library of Korea (in South Korea) has an online collection of newspapers published in Korea prior to 1950. The link I posted is to the English-language interface, but the newspapers are in Korean.
• Mexico: El Universal is online for 1999 to the present.
• Sierra Leone: I discovered that Early Dawn, available on FultonHistory.com and incorrectly labeled as "Earley Dawn", is also on the Internet Archive and much easier to read, although the site notes that some issues are missing.
• California: The Monterey Public Library has digitized its historical newspaper collection and placed it online for free. The 34 newspapers range from 1846 to the present. They are listed on the library's site in chronological order, which is a little different.
• Florida: The Weekly Challenger, the newspaper of the black community of St. Petersburg, has partnered with the University of South Florida at St. Petersburg, which is now hosting digitized issues of the paper for 1976, 1985–1988, and 2009–2016. Plans are to to digitize more historic issues and add them to the online archive.
• Idaho: The University of Idaho has digitized the historical run of Argonaut, the student newspaper, and posted it online.
• Illinois: The Aurora Public Library has online indices for the Aurora Beacon-News for obituaries (1933–2004 with many gaps) and for a clipping collection (1925–1956 and 1963–1978).
• Illinois: The Coal City Public Library has a searchable index for obituaries and death notices, most of which came from the Coal City Courant newspaper. The index can be searched only by surname, and nothing on the page indicates what years the database covers. I searched for Smith as a general test, and years ranged from 1884 to 2017.
• Kansas: The Rossville Community Library not only has posted an obituary index online, it has gone the extra step and scanned and posted the obituaries listed in the index.
• Massachusetts: Smith College has placed every issue of its alumnae quarterly, for 1909 to the present, online.
• Michigan: Oakland County has an online historical archive site which houses what appears to be a substantial collection of digitized newspapers. Unfortunately, I can't find a way to determine the names of the newspapers in the collection or what years it covers. Seventy-four locations are listed on the browse page.
• Michigan: The University of Michigan has an online archive of the historical run of the student newspaper, The Michigan Daily.
• Missouri: The St. Louis Genealogical Society has posted issue of the Friedens Messenger, published by the Friedens United Church of Christ, for 1940 and earlier, although the range is not specified. Paid members of the society may view the digitized files.
• New Jersey: The Elizabeth Daily Journal for 1872–1915 (with more years to be digitized and posted online) is available courtesy of the Elizabeth Public Library.
• New York: The entire run of the New Yorker, all the way back to 1925, is now available through the New York Public Library site with a library card.
• Ohio: The Lepper Public Library has a collection of seventeen newspapers covering the Lisbon (formerly New Lisbon) area, ranging from 1810 to 2011 (with a lot of gaps).
• Ohio: The Ohio National Guard has shifted its publication, The Buckeye Guard, from print to digital and has posted the archives of the print edition (1976–2011) on its new site.
• Ohio: The Salem Public Library has an obituary index for 1938–2016 for the Salem News and will send you a copy of the obituary. It also has the "Yesteryears" section of the News for 1991–2002 online.
• Ohio: The Warren–Trumbull County Public Library has two indices for obituaries: The Warren Tribune Chronicle for 1900–1949 and the Youngstown Vindicator for 2011–2014.
• Pennsylvania: Elizabethtown College has digitized its students newspapers, Our College Times (1904–1934) and The Etownian (1934–2009), and uploaded them to the Internet Archive.
• Tennessee: A near-complete archive of the original incarnation of Confederate Veteran magazine, from 1893–1932, including a searchable index, can be found on the Internet Archive. I placed it under Tennessee because that's where it was published.
• Texas: The Texas Obituary Project is a collection of scanned obits from LGBT publications, dating back to 1975.
• Wisconsin: The complete historical run of the print version of the UWM Post, the student newspaper of the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, has been digitized.
• Multistate: The Catholic News Archive currently has nine newspapers (including one issue from 1832!) from five different states and the United States in general. This is a Veridian site (yay!), and more newspapers will be added over time.
• Multistate: FamilySearch.org now has a database of GenealogyBank obituaries from 1980–2014. Even though GenealogyBank itself is a pay site, this collection is free.
• Worldwide: Catholic Newspapers Online is a portal collecting links to Catholic newspapers from multiple countries, both historical and current, and has 22 pages of links so far.
• Worldwide: "Last Seen: Finding Family after Slavery" is a collection of ads posted in newspapers after Emancipation, where people tried to find relatives from whom they had been separated, whether by slavery, escape, or the military. Currently the volunteer effort includes notices one Canadian and thirteen U.S. newspapers, but the project continually grows.
• Worldwide: The Mennonite Library and Archives in Kansas has placed online a large collection of German-language newspapers and other publications from German Mennonites. The countries include Canada and Paraguay!
Lucky for us researchers, almost all of the newspapers added have free access. The exception is the Friedens Messenger, for which you need to be a paid member of the St. Louis Genealogical society.
• Hungary: Although the newspaper itself has closed down, the online archive of Népszabadság is being maintained for free access. I don't read Hungarian, however, and I can't figure out what years are covered.
• Korea (new country!): Yes, you read that right, Korea. Not North or South, but just plain old Korea. The National Library of Korea (in South Korea) has an online collection of newspapers published in Korea prior to 1950. The link I posted is to the English-language interface, but the newspapers are in Korean.
• Mexico: El Universal is online for 1999 to the present.
• Sierra Leone: I discovered that Early Dawn, available on FultonHistory.com and incorrectly labeled as "Earley Dawn", is also on the Internet Archive and much easier to read, although the site notes that some issues are missing.
• California: The Monterey Public Library has digitized its historical newspaper collection and placed it online for free. The 34 newspapers range from 1846 to the present. They are listed on the library's site in chronological order, which is a little different.
• Florida: The Weekly Challenger, the newspaper of the black community of St. Petersburg, has partnered with the University of South Florida at St. Petersburg, which is now hosting digitized issues of the paper for 1976, 1985–1988, and 2009–2016. Plans are to to digitize more historic issues and add them to the online archive.
• Idaho: The University of Idaho has digitized the historical run of Argonaut, the student newspaper, and posted it online.
• Illinois: The Aurora Public Library has online indices for the Aurora Beacon-News for obituaries (1933–2004 with many gaps) and for a clipping collection (1925–1956 and 1963–1978).
• Illinois: The Coal City Public Library has a searchable index for obituaries and death notices, most of which came from the Coal City Courant newspaper. The index can be searched only by surname, and nothing on the page indicates what years the database covers. I searched for Smith as a general test, and years ranged from 1884 to 2017.
• Kansas: The Rossville Community Library not only has posted an obituary index online, it has gone the extra step and scanned and posted the obituaries listed in the index.
• Massachusetts: Smith College has placed every issue of its alumnae quarterly, for 1909 to the present, online.
• Michigan: Oakland County has an online historical archive site which houses what appears to be a substantial collection of digitized newspapers. Unfortunately, I can't find a way to determine the names of the newspapers in the collection or what years it covers. Seventy-four locations are listed on the browse page.
• Michigan: The University of Michigan has an online archive of the historical run of the student newspaper, The Michigan Daily.
• Missouri: The St. Louis Genealogical Society has posted issue of the Friedens Messenger, published by the Friedens United Church of Christ, for 1940 and earlier, although the range is not specified. Paid members of the society may view the digitized files.
• New Jersey: The Elizabeth Daily Journal for 1872–1915 (with more years to be digitized and posted online) is available courtesy of the Elizabeth Public Library.
• New York: The entire run of the New Yorker, all the way back to 1925, is now available through the New York Public Library site with a library card.
• Ohio: The Lepper Public Library has a collection of seventeen newspapers covering the Lisbon (formerly New Lisbon) area, ranging from 1810 to 2011 (with a lot of gaps).
• Ohio: The Ohio National Guard has shifted its publication, The Buckeye Guard, from print to digital and has posted the archives of the print edition (1976–2011) on its new site.
• Ohio: The Salem Public Library has an obituary index for 1938–2016 for the Salem News and will send you a copy of the obituary. It also has the "Yesteryears" section of the News for 1991–2002 online.
• Ohio: The Warren–Trumbull County Public Library has two indices for obituaries: The Warren Tribune Chronicle for 1900–1949 and the Youngstown Vindicator for 2011–2014.
• Pennsylvania: Elizabethtown College has digitized its students newspapers, Our College Times (1904–1934) and The Etownian (1934–2009), and uploaded them to the Internet Archive.
• Tennessee: A near-complete archive of the original incarnation of Confederate Veteran magazine, from 1893–1932, including a searchable index, can be found on the Internet Archive. I placed it under Tennessee because that's where it was published.
• Texas: The Texas Obituary Project is a collection of scanned obits from LGBT publications, dating back to 1975.
• Wisconsin: The complete historical run of the print version of the UWM Post, the student newspaper of the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, has been digitized.
• Multistate: The Catholic News Archive currently has nine newspapers (including one issue from 1832!) from five different states and the United States in general. This is a Veridian site (yay!), and more newspapers will be added over time.
• Multistate: FamilySearch.org now has a database of GenealogyBank obituaries from 1980–2014. Even though GenealogyBank itself is a pay site, this collection is free.
• Worldwide: Catholic Newspapers Online is a portal collecting links to Catholic newspapers from multiple countries, both historical and current, and has 22 pages of links so far.
• Worldwide: "Last Seen: Finding Family after Slavery" is a collection of ads posted in newspapers after Emancipation, where people tried to find relatives from whom they had been separated, whether by slavery, escape, or the military. Currently the volunteer effort includes notices one Canadian and thirteen U.S. newspapers, but the project continually grows.
• Worldwide: The Mennonite Library and Archives in Kansas has placed online a large collection of German-language newspapers and other publications from German Mennonites. The countries include Canada and Paraguay!
Labels:
black genealogy,
California,
Catholic,
Florida,
Hungary,
Illinois,
Kansas,
Korea,
Massachusetts,
Mexico,
Michigan,
New Jersey,
newspaper research,
Ohio,
Sierra Leone,
Tennessee,
Texas,
Wikipedia
Tuesday, November 22, 2016
Newspapers, Newspapers, Newspapers!
I have been meaning to post another update of what has been added to the Wikipedia newspaper archives page for a while now, but I've been distracted by a lot of other projects. I didn't realize it had been seven months since I last posted! I'm trying to catch up, though, so here are some of the most recent additions. One new country, Lithuania, and new state, Kansas, have been added to the list. Several of the new archives are being created by one of two companies, Advantage Preservation (which does them with free access) or Newspapers.com (which makes them available for a subscription fee).
• Australia: Honi Soit, the student newspaper of the University of Sydney (New South Wales), has been digitized for 1929–1990.
• British Columbia, Canada: The Prince George Public Library has eight newspapers, including the student newspaper for the College of New Caledonia, on its site, ranging from 1909–1965.
• British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University has a collection of digitized newspapers online, including the student newspaper The Peak and one group called simply "More Newspapers."
• British Columbia, Canada: The Thompson-Nicola Regional District library is digitizing newspapers from the Kamloops area and has a selection available covering 1882–2014.
• Cuba: Diario de la Marina is available through the University of Florida's newspaper collection. Years covered range between 1844 and 1961, but coverage is not continuous.
• England: The Church Times, an Anglican newspaper, has an online archive dating back to its first issue in 1863 and including more than 8,000 issues.
• France: Two collections of images from Excelsior, a weekly publication that published 20+ photographs in every issue during World War I, are available.
• Italy: Nine months of the 1885 issues of Il Secolo, published in Milan, are on the Florida State University digital archives site. The press release I read suggested that more issues will be coming at some point in the future.
• Lithuania: A new country! Someone has digitized the Vilna Provincial Gazette and posted it on the Internet Archive. The years covered are 1838–1917, with a few years missing. This was published while Lithuania was under the control of the Russian Empire.
• Mexico, Arizona, California, and Texas (under Worldwide category): The Historic Mexican & Mexican American Press collection includes newspapers from Tucson, Arizona; Los Angeles and San Francisco, California; El Paso, Texas; and Sonora, Mexico. The archive goes from the mid-1800's to the 1970's.
• New Zealand: The Southern Regional News Index covers the Dunedin and Otago area for 1851 to the present.
• United Kingdom: The Gazette has created an instructional video on how to search and use the online Gazette archives.
• California: The GLBT Historical Society of Northern California has an online searchable database of obituaries (not just an index) for the Bay Area Reporter, a weekly newspaper covering the GLBT community primarily in the San Francisco Bay area, for the years 1972 to the present. The Bay Area Reporter itself has an online archive that begins with 2005 and is working on digitizing its issues going back to 1971.
• California: The St. Helena Public Library has the St. Helena Star from 1874–2014 available for free.
• California: The now defunct San Fernando Valley Genealogical Society posted a collection of vital records abstracts on RootsWeb for Valley newspapers covering 1911–1945.
• Connecticut: The Shelton Library has two collections of newspaper clippings. The "Library Scrapbook" has clippings from multiple newspapers from 1923–1930 relating to the Plumb Memorial Library. The "Servicemen's Scrapbook of Shelton Men & Women Serving in World War" has clippings from the Evening Sentinel from 1943–1945, so apparently those servicemen were serving in World War II.
• District of Columbia: The Capital is online for 1871–1880 and is said to be a great source for research in the Reconstruction period.
• District of Columbia: Quicksilver Times (1973–1985) and Unicorn Times (1969–1972) are available from the Washington, DC Public Library.
• Georgia: The Macon Daily Telegraph for 1860–1865 is in the American Civil War Newspapers database at Virginia Tech.
• Illinois: The Lake Forester for 1899–1940 is on the Lake Forest Library site.
• Indiana: The AIM Media Indiana archive, which has eleven newspapers, is a pay site created via a Newspapers.com partnership.
• Iowa: Central College in Pella has ten collections of student newspapers and yearbooks covering 1876–2006, but there are some gaps in coverage.
• Iowa: West Branch newspapers the Local Record and Times, from 1866–1934, are on the West Branch Public Library.
• Kansas: A new state! There is an obituary index for Rush County at the Barnard Library site. It covers 1878–1951. Copies of the obituaries can be ordered from the library.
• Kentucky: The Lawrence County Public Library has an online obituary index for the Big Sandy News that covers 1885 to the present.
• Louisiana: The New Orleans Christian Advocate, a Methodist newspaper, is only for 1850–1946.
• Louisiana: Scanned ads from former slaves looking for family members and friends lost during slavery which were published in the New Orleans Southwestern Christian Advocate (1879–1885) — which does not appear to be related to the previously mentioned paper — are available for free online.
• Maine: Digital Maine has the Old Orchard Mirror, a newspaper published only during the summer, for the years 1900, 1901, 1903, 1904, and 1914.
• Maryland: The Annapolis Capital has been digitized and placed online by NewspaperArchive.com on a pay site. The collection nominally goes from 1887–2016, but it goes straight from 1887 to 1918–1919 and then to 1929. It looked continuous from then on.
• Massachusetts: The Memorial Hall Library in Andover has three newspapers covering 1853–1925.
• Massachusetts: The Newburyport Public Library has ten digitized newspapers available for free on its site, courtesy of Advantage Preservation.
• Massachusetts: The Portuguese-American Digital Newspaper Collections, housed at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth, includes Portuguese-language newspapers from California, Hawaii, and Massachusetts.
• Massachusetts: The (Mattapoisett) Wanderer, which also serves Marion and Rochester in southeastern Massachusetts, has an online archive for its entire publication history, 1992–2016, housed at the Internet Archive.
• Minnesota: Two union newspapers, the Minneapolis Labor Review (1907–current) and St. Paul Union Advocate (unsure of years covered), are now online.
• Missouri: The Houston Herald has been digitized and placed online courtesy of Newspapers.com for 1881–present and is a pay site.
• Missouri: There are online indices for death notices appearing in the St. Louis Globe-Democrat and the Post-Dispatch, along with instructions on how to order copies.
• Montana: The Montana Newspapers project has some dupblication with the Montana Memory Project but includes many more newspapers. The years range from 1885 to 2015.
• New Jersey: The Belmar Historical Society has the Coast Echo and Coast Advertiser for 1881–1974 in PDF and searchable.
• New Jersey: The New Jersey Hills Media Group has partnered with Newspapers.com to present three newspapers on a pay site.
• New Jersey: The Woodbridge Public Library has digitized eleven local newspapers ranging from 1876–1970.
• New Mexico: The White Sands Missile Range published its own newspapers, which cover 1950–1990. There is a list of the issues that are missing, so if you have an old issue, maybe you can help!
• New York: A new collection of four Staten Island newspapers has been made available, with plans for more to come.
• North Carolina: The Nubian Message (1992–2005), the black student newspaper of North Carolina State University, has been digitized and placed online.
• Ohio: The Stark County District Library has digitized eight newspapers in partnership with Advantage Preservation.
• Ohio: The WestLife Observer (2013–2015) and the Westlake Bay Village Observer (2006–2015) are online at Westlake Library site.
• Oklahoma: The Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College student newspaper, The Norse Wind, is online for 1948–2007.
• Virginia: The Library of Virginia has the Charlottesville Daily Progress available for 1893–1964.
• Virginia: The Prince William County Library System has a local newspaper index for 1993–present for three newspapers that have no other index available.
• Virginia: The Pulaski County Library newspaper archive has five newspapers that range from 1893 to 2015.
• Virginia: The Handley Regional Library System has an obituary index for the Winchester Star for 1896–1914. This is a work in progress, and more information is being added to it.
• Wisconsin: The Lake Geneva Public Library has searchable indices for obituaries, birth announcements, and local people in the news. The site does not state which newspapers or years are covered, but an announcement from NEHGS said the obituaries were taken from the Lake Geneva Regional News and Lake Geneva Herald. The local people in the news database iincludes the code LGNT, which I believe stands for Lake Geneva News Tribune.
• Multistate: The Swedish American Newspapers collection, hosted at the Minnesota Historical Society, includes 28 newspapers from California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, Oregon, Texas, and Washington. Total years covered in the database are 1859–2007.
Earlier this year, the National Endowment for the Humanities, one of the funders for the Chronicling America digitization project, announced that the years which can be funded are expanding from 1836–1922 to 1690–1963. This means that eventually we should see a much broader range of historical newspapers on the Chronicling America site. You can read the press release here.
• Australia: Honi Soit, the student newspaper of the University of Sydney (New South Wales), has been digitized for 1929–1990.
• British Columbia, Canada: The Prince George Public Library has eight newspapers, including the student newspaper for the College of New Caledonia, on its site, ranging from 1909–1965.
• British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University has a collection of digitized newspapers online, including the student newspaper The Peak and one group called simply "More Newspapers."
• British Columbia, Canada: The Thompson-Nicola Regional District library is digitizing newspapers from the Kamloops area and has a selection available covering 1882–2014.
• Cuba: Diario de la Marina is available through the University of Florida's newspaper collection. Years covered range between 1844 and 1961, but coverage is not continuous.
• England: The Church Times, an Anglican newspaper, has an online archive dating back to its first issue in 1863 and including more than 8,000 issues.
• France: Two collections of images from Excelsior, a weekly publication that published 20+ photographs in every issue during World War I, are available.
• Italy: Nine months of the 1885 issues of Il Secolo, published in Milan, are on the Florida State University digital archives site. The press release I read suggested that more issues will be coming at some point in the future.
• Lithuania: A new country! Someone has digitized the Vilna Provincial Gazette and posted it on the Internet Archive. The years covered are 1838–1917, with a few years missing. This was published while Lithuania was under the control of the Russian Empire.
• Mexico, Arizona, California, and Texas (under Worldwide category): The Historic Mexican & Mexican American Press collection includes newspapers from Tucson, Arizona; Los Angeles and San Francisco, California; El Paso, Texas; and Sonora, Mexico. The archive goes from the mid-1800's to the 1970's.
• New Zealand: The Southern Regional News Index covers the Dunedin and Otago area for 1851 to the present.
• United Kingdom: The Gazette has created an instructional video on how to search and use the online Gazette archives.
• California: The GLBT Historical Society of Northern California has an online searchable database of obituaries (not just an index) for the Bay Area Reporter, a weekly newspaper covering the GLBT community primarily in the San Francisco Bay area, for the years 1972 to the present. The Bay Area Reporter itself has an online archive that begins with 2005 and is working on digitizing its issues going back to 1971.
• California: The St. Helena Public Library has the St. Helena Star from 1874–2014 available for free.
• California: The now defunct San Fernando Valley Genealogical Society posted a collection of vital records abstracts on RootsWeb for Valley newspapers covering 1911–1945.
• Connecticut: The Shelton Library has two collections of newspaper clippings. The "Library Scrapbook" has clippings from multiple newspapers from 1923–1930 relating to the Plumb Memorial Library. The "Servicemen's Scrapbook of Shelton Men & Women Serving in World War" has clippings from the Evening Sentinel from 1943–1945, so apparently those servicemen were serving in World War II.
• District of Columbia: The Capital is online for 1871–1880 and is said to be a great source for research in the Reconstruction period.
• District of Columbia: Quicksilver Times (1973–1985) and Unicorn Times (1969–1972) are available from the Washington, DC Public Library.
• Georgia: The Macon Daily Telegraph for 1860–1865 is in the American Civil War Newspapers database at Virginia Tech.
• Illinois: The Lake Forester for 1899–1940 is on the Lake Forest Library site.
• Indiana: The AIM Media Indiana archive, which has eleven newspapers, is a pay site created via a Newspapers.com partnership.
• Iowa: Central College in Pella has ten collections of student newspapers and yearbooks covering 1876–2006, but there are some gaps in coverage.
• Iowa: West Branch newspapers the Local Record and Times, from 1866–1934, are on the West Branch Public Library.
• Kansas: A new state! There is an obituary index for Rush County at the Barnard Library site. It covers 1878–1951. Copies of the obituaries can be ordered from the library.
• Kentucky: The Lawrence County Public Library has an online obituary index for the Big Sandy News that covers 1885 to the present.
• Louisiana: The New Orleans Christian Advocate, a Methodist newspaper, is only for 1850–1946.
• Louisiana: Scanned ads from former slaves looking for family members and friends lost during slavery which were published in the New Orleans Southwestern Christian Advocate (1879–1885) — which does not appear to be related to the previously mentioned paper — are available for free online.
• Maine: Digital Maine has the Old Orchard Mirror, a newspaper published only during the summer, for the years 1900, 1901, 1903, 1904, and 1914.
• Maryland: The Annapolis Capital has been digitized and placed online by NewspaperArchive.com on a pay site. The collection nominally goes from 1887–2016, but it goes straight from 1887 to 1918–1919 and then to 1929. It looked continuous from then on.
• Massachusetts: The Memorial Hall Library in Andover has three newspapers covering 1853–1925.
• Massachusetts: The Newburyport Public Library has ten digitized newspapers available for free on its site, courtesy of Advantage Preservation.
• Massachusetts: The Portuguese-American Digital Newspaper Collections, housed at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth, includes Portuguese-language newspapers from California, Hawaii, and Massachusetts.
• Massachusetts: The (Mattapoisett) Wanderer, which also serves Marion and Rochester in southeastern Massachusetts, has an online archive for its entire publication history, 1992–2016, housed at the Internet Archive.
• Minnesota: Two union newspapers, the Minneapolis Labor Review (1907–current) and St. Paul Union Advocate (unsure of years covered), are now online.
• Missouri: The Houston Herald has been digitized and placed online courtesy of Newspapers.com for 1881–present and is a pay site.
• Missouri: There are online indices for death notices appearing in the St. Louis Globe-Democrat and the Post-Dispatch, along with instructions on how to order copies.
• Montana: The Montana Newspapers project has some dupblication with the Montana Memory Project but includes many more newspapers. The years range from 1885 to 2015.
• New Jersey: The Belmar Historical Society has the Coast Echo and Coast Advertiser for 1881–1974 in PDF and searchable.
• New Jersey: The New Jersey Hills Media Group has partnered with Newspapers.com to present three newspapers on a pay site.
• New Jersey: The Woodbridge Public Library has digitized eleven local newspapers ranging from 1876–1970.
• New Mexico: The White Sands Missile Range published its own newspapers, which cover 1950–1990. There is a list of the issues that are missing, so if you have an old issue, maybe you can help!
• New York: A new collection of four Staten Island newspapers has been made available, with plans for more to come.
• North Carolina: The Nubian Message (1992–2005), the black student newspaper of North Carolina State University, has been digitized and placed online.
• Ohio: The Stark County District Library has digitized eight newspapers in partnership with Advantage Preservation.
• Ohio: The WestLife Observer (2013–2015) and the Westlake Bay Village Observer (2006–2015) are online at Westlake Library site.
• Oklahoma: The Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College student newspaper, The Norse Wind, is online for 1948–2007.
• Virginia: The Library of Virginia has the Charlottesville Daily Progress available for 1893–1964.
• Virginia: The Prince William County Library System has a local newspaper index for 1993–present for three newspapers that have no other index available.
• Virginia: The Pulaski County Library newspaper archive has five newspapers that range from 1893 to 2015.
• Virginia: The Handley Regional Library System has an obituary index for the Winchester Star for 1896–1914. This is a work in progress, and more information is being added to it.
• Wisconsin: The Lake Geneva Public Library has searchable indices for obituaries, birth announcements, and local people in the news. The site does not state which newspapers or years are covered, but an announcement from NEHGS said the obituaries were taken from the Lake Geneva Regional News and Lake Geneva Herald. The local people in the news database iincludes the code LGNT, which I believe stands for Lake Geneva News Tribune.
• Multistate: The Swedish American Newspapers collection, hosted at the Minnesota Historical Society, includes 28 newspapers from California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, Oregon, Texas, and Washington. Total years covered in the database are 1859–2007.
Earlier this year, the National Endowment for the Humanities, one of the funders for the Chronicling America digitization project, announced that the years which can be funded are expanding from 1836–1922 to 1690–1963. This means that eventually we should see a much broader range of historical newspapers on the Chronicling America site. You can read the press release here.
Labels:
Canada,
Cuba,
Italy,
Kansas,
Lithuania,
Louisiana,
Maine,
Massachusetts,
Mexico,
New Jersey,
New Mexico,
New Zealand,
newspaper research,
Ohio,
Oklahoma,
Virginia,
Washington DC,
Wikipedia,
Wisconsin
Monday, April 11, 2016
"Who Do You Think You Are?" - Aisha Tyler
So, Who Do You Think You Are? is back, and I'm already running behind! Not a good way to start the season. I barely finished scribbling my notes for the first episode (after rewatching it three times) a couple of hours before the second episode aired, and I couldn't write the post before that. Ah, well, I have all week to try to catch up.
This season's celebrities for the most part are unknown to me. I know who Molly Ringwald and Katey Sagal are, and that's it. I guess I'll be learning about the others as their stories are aired.
The teaser for Aisha Tyler, the season opener, said that she would be learning about her mother's family history. One ancestor had shocking beliefs, while another refused to be held down. We would see an extraordinary story about celebrating victory and courage over adversity.
I now know that Aisha Tyler has had an accomplished, wide-ranging entertainment career as a comedian, actor, host, producer, author, and director. She apparently first made a mark in Friends (a program I never saw while it was being aired in first run, and oh!, she was in a total of nine episodes) and who is also known for her work on The Talk (never seen it), Whose Line Is It Anyway? (only watched the original, British, better version; apparently she's hosting the third iteration), and Criminal Minds (used to watch it but stopped a few years ago, well before she joined the cast). She also has a Podcast called Girl on Guy (never heard of it). (Yes, I feel old, thank you.) She lives and works in Los Angeles (at least I used to live there!).
Tyler begins by telling us that she is a workaholic. She's curious about how she arrived at her outlook on life and figures it must be a legacy of the relatives who came before her. I found it interesting that we did not see any of her family members in the episode.
Tyler was born in San Francisco, California. Her parents are James Herman Tyler and Robin Adair Gregory, both of whom were dream-driven. When Tyler was about 10 years old her parents divorced. (She did not mention it in the episode, but her Wikipedia write-up says that she lived with her father after that.) Her parents were very different: Her father was a hard-driving, rugged, motorcycle-riding badass, while her mother was an elegant, artistic, intellectual painter who attended Howard. (Yeah, that's pretty different.)
Tyler has heard a fair amount of family stories about her mother's side. She realizes that some are probably true, while others are likely apocryphal. Her mother suggested that she write to her great-aunt Sheila Gregory Thomas, her mother's father's sister, for information, as she is the family historian. Tyler has apparently received a letter from her aunt in response, although the envelope she opens on camera has no writing or stamp on it. (Maybe little elves delivered it.) She reads portions of the letter, but I have transcribed it in its entirety here. The letter was typed and unsigned.
Dear Aisha
It's so exciting to know that you will be on a journey to uncover further information regarding our family history! There is so much more I am curious about, so I hope you'll be able to find the answers. Meanwhile, I believe the following information may be helpful to you.
My father, Thomas Montgomery Gregory — your maternal great grand father — graduated from Harvard in 1910, at a time when, as you can imagine, there were very few Black students.
He went on to teach English, drama, and debating at Howard University, and also founded and directed the Howard Players, a significant African American theater troupe. His father, James Monroe Gregory — your maternal 2x great grandfather — was born free in Virginia in 1849, graduated from Howard in 1872, and went on to become an important advocate for Black education in America. He was a protégé of Frederick Douglass.
My mother, Hugh Ella Hancock Gregory, who of course was your maternal great grand mother, was born in 1896. She was also well-educated — she attended Fisk University, which as you know, is a Historically Black College like Howard.
Sadly, although our research on our family ancestry has produced a great amount of detail regarding the Gregory side, my mother's history is fuzzier.
Her father, your 2x great grand father, Hugh Berry Hancock, attended school in Oberlin, Ohio in the 1860s and early 1870s. After many years of marriage and raising a family, Hugh and hiw wife, Susie James, separated.
When Hugh died, my mother was just a teenager and she had not seen him for some time. These circumstances left a gap in our personal knowledge about him. My theory is that Hugh became something of a rolling stone and wanted everyone to roll along with him, but that Susie wanted more stability for their family. I have enclosed a photo of Hugh, the only one our family has left.
There is a marvelous proverb, which I believe is African: "When an old person dies, it is like a library burning down." I wish I had asked my mother more about Hugh before she passed away.
Happy hunting, Aisha!
Aunt Sheila
OOXX
Tyler did not read the sections about James Monroe Gregory, the "fuzzier" comment about Sheila's mother's side of the family, Hugh possibly being a "rolling stone", or the paragraph about the proverb (which has been attributed to several origins, not only Africa) out loud.
Tyler notices that Hugh, who is clearly light-complected in the photo, looks a lot like her own mother. She is excited and loves adventure, and is looking forward to learning about the people who came before her. She "decides" (i.e., the producers told her) to go to Oberlin, Ohio, the only place she knows that Hugh lived, to start her research. (Of course, she doesn't actually know that he lived there, only that her great-aunt said he was there. But we'll take Aunt Sheila at her word, won't we?)
She goes to the Mudd Center at Oberlin College, probably to the library, and meets with Christi Smith, whose unusual on-screen credit reads "Author, Reparation and Reconciliation, Oberlin College." (She was a visiting professor at Oberlin as of the writing of this post, but the book was published by the University of North Carolina Press.) She tells Smith that she knows her great-great-grandfather Hugh Berry Hancock attended Oberlin (which she doesn't; again, she was merely told that by her aunt) and that she wants to learn more about his time there. But we wouldn't be at Oberlin if Hancock hadn't been there himself at some time, right? So Smith brings out a college catalog from 1872–1873. An alphabetical list of names includes Hugh B. Hancock of Austin, Texas.
This is Tyler's first surprise: She had no idea her ancestor was from Texas. Smith then turns to the page for the department Hancock was in, which was the Preparatory Department. She explains it prepared students for college, the ministry, and other areas. The students were older than high school but not quite college-aged (my mental analogy was what junior colleges used to be like).
From this the two women go to the computer and Ancestry.com (only eight minutes into the episode!) to learn more about Hancock. Smith has Tyler go to the main census search page and search for Hugh Hancock in Oberlin, Ohio with exact match off. They get seven results, the top two of which appear to be Tyler's Hugh Hancock. (That's funny, because when I do that exact same search, I have 456,202 results. Clicking on 1800's only brings the total down to 273,047, so I don't know how they got it down to seven. At least when I restricted it to 1800's the two with Tyler's Hugh Hancock were at the top of my list also.)
Smith suggests that Tyler look at the earlier census first (not the right way to do research!). The page shows a 5-year-old Hugh "Handcock" (actually transcribed by Ancestry as Handtock). (Hey, that means he was only 17 years old when he was at Oberlin in 1872! Hmm, that sounds like high-school age to me.) Looking down the "race" column, Tyler discovers Hancock is listed as mulatto, which really surprises her. She comments that it's a word not used much nowadays and that the politically correct term would be bi- or multiracial. Smith points out that the main thing to keep in mind is that it means he had at least one white ancestor.
The next thing that Tyler fixes on is that Hancock was born in Texas, which means he was born into slavery, but that he is now living in Ohio, a free state. He is in a household with several other people, including some Pattersons, but with no one else of the same surname. Smith explains that the Pattersons were a black family who ran a boarding house. They had students and others who lived there.
Tyler looks distressed and says it's clear from the "register" (census) that Hancock was not living with any parent or relative (which is not actually true; the 1860 census does not list relationships, so someone in the household could have been related and simply not had the same name, such as a remarried mother, a cousin, etc.). She wants to know how he got to Oberlin from Texas. Smith tells her that Oberlin was an important point on the Underground Railroad, and that in 1860 about 20% of the population was black.
From that Smith makes the leap to suggest that maybe someone had posted an ad about Hancock if he had run away. (Um, a 5-year-old running away by himself? Yeah, she's reaching.) She tells Tyler to search on Newspapers.com (yes, owned by Ancestry) to see what she can find. She has Tyler search for hugh hancock and the word "mulatto" in Oberlin, Ohio. (No, of course she doesn't know what Tyler will find! How could you think such a thing?) Amazingly enough (you're surprised, right?), the New Castle Index of New Castle, Pennsylvania, dated November 3, 1880, has a short note about Hancock and the possibilities being discussed about his parentage:
The two men being bandied about as the possible father were General W. S. Hancock (the W. S. stood for Winfield Scott, a name I came across in my Emma Schafer research) and Old John Hancock. The general was at the time a U.S. presidential candidate for the Republican Party. Tyler says that the Republicans at that time were the socially progressive party, which Smith confirms, but then she says that the party was opposed to rights for blacks, which I could not understand in the context of what they were discussing. About Old John Hancock, Smith says, "I've got nothing!" At the time he was probably well known enough that no explanation was needed in the article, but that doesn't help now.
The article doesn't draw any conclusions about which man might actually be Hancock's father, so Tyler asks how she can find out which was her 3x-great-grandfather (without allowing for the possibility that it might have been neither). Smith points out that the dateline for the article is Cleveland, Ohio and that the article says a reporter for the Leader, a Cleveland newspaper, was investigating the question. She tells Tyler that she should go to the Western Reserve Historical Society in Cleveland to see if maybe a longer article was published in the Leader.
As Tyler leaves Oberlin, she says she has questions about Hancock and which man, the general or "Old John", was his father. She's hoping for the general, not Old John, whom she is sure was famous for holding up the corner of the bar. She also figures that it will probably be the general because that would make for better television. (Ah, I see I'm not the only person who understands "TV logic.")
We next see Tyler in Cleveland at the Western Reserve Historical Society, where she meets Daina Ramey Berry (we saw her in the Alfre Woodard episode). Berry has a real, historic copy of the Cleveland Leader from October 29, 1880 for Tyler to look at. (And I was happy to see they did not handle the newspaper with conservator's gloves.) As Tyler pages through the issue looking for her great-great-grandfather's name, she finds it at the top of a page in large type. (The article itself runs the entire length of the page and over to the next column. It's available online at GenealogyBank.com, but I guess Ancestry was only willing to allow them on screen, albeit uncredited, in one episode.)
Tyler reads bits and pieces of the article. The upshot is that after the Leader reporter researched the matter, Old John Hancock seems to be the father of Hugh, rather than the presidential candidate. The article also has some information about Hugh Hancock's apparent mother and brother, with whom he was said to have come to Oberlin. The brother died and the mother was not seen again; no one seemed to know whether she had died or left Oberlin. And somehow Hugh Hancock ended up in the Patterson boarding house.
Tyler is struck by the tragedy that Hancock had already experienced by the time he was five, with his brother dying and his mother gone. She also wonders how the family would have gotten to Oberlin. Berry suggests that one way would have been via the Underground Railroad, but it's also possible that Hancock's father might have paid for them to leave. Tyler had been hoping to learn the name of her 3x-great-grandmother also, but it is not given in the article. Berry says she was probably a slave. (Do any documents survive from Old John? If so, did the family not feel inclined to work with the show's producers? I'll revisit this point later.)
Tyler at this point was refreshingly direct. Whereas previous celebrities, the first time they are confronted with some evidence of their ancestor's enslavement, have been very dramatic, she simply matter-of-factly said it was true and there's no whitewashing the fact. The "cruel but intimate institution" of slavery meant that if the mother was a slave, her children were slaves.
Taking the article at its word, Berry tells Tyler that to learn more on Old John, she'll need to go to Texas. The Texas State Library in Austin should have information about him, as he was a state congressman and socially prominent. Tyler finds some solace in the fact that Austin has a "treasure trove of barbecue."
Tyler is happy that she has learned the name of her 3x-great-grandfather. The last 48 hours have been exciting and overwhelming. She's learned some good and bad: Old John was a congressman, but she believes he was a slave owner. She isn't devastated, she just wants to know more.
Something odd that caught my eye was when they showed a sign outside the historical society building. It had the name, Western Reserve Historical Society, and the address, 10825 East Boulevard, and then what looked like two lines of text that were blurred out of focus. It's a public sign; it probably has something like the hours and maybe the phone number of the society. Why in the world would they need to obscure that?
Anyway, off to Texas we go! As she heads toward the Texas State Library and Archives, Tyler says that Berry recommended she speak to Kim Kellison regarding her search for John Hancock. Of course, Kellison (a "Historian of the South" at Baylor University) is inside waiting to greet her. Tyler tells her she wants to know more about Old John, his life, and his relationship with Hugh. Kellison has of course found something: an article from the December 20, 1865 issue of the Galveston Weekly News, which they look at on microfilm. I can't find that newspaper online at Chronicling America, GenealogyBank, Newspaper Archive, Newspapers.com, or anywhere else, but here's a transcription of the article.
In compliance with the request of many of our citizens the Honorable John Hancock delivered an address to the people of San Antonio, last evening, suggesting many idea[s] for them to cogitate upon, now that they will soon be called upon to act for themselves in a very important capacity. We have not time to more than briefly allude to several of the prominent subjects that he discussed, nor have we the space in order to give justice to the speaker. The address was a masterly effort and we do not think that we go far amiss in saying that the sentiments entertained by Judge Hancock met a response in the breast of every man present who had a desire for his country's welfare.
He thought that so far as disagreements in regard to the war and what brought it on were concerned we should let the past bury the dead, seize the present, and calmly and dispassionately consider the future. He was anxious to get rid of the military, saying that whenever it became necessary to rule this country by force of arms, from that day would date the downfall of the Republic. He considered the Provisional government equally "damnable," and although approving the course of the administration of Andrew Johnson as far as it had been developed, yet he thought the people of Texas, who were the only ones that did not lay down their arms at the point of the bayonet, had been badly treated in not being allowed three months ago to assume their original position in the Union.
He illustrated his views on the "negro suffrage" question, when called upon to express them by saying that when he became in favor of letting a mule vote, that he would give the suffrage to the negro. At the close he paid a glowing tribute to Lee, S--ney Jackson, Stonewall Jackson, Sherman and Grant. There was never a time during war at which he would not have been willing to have referred the matters in dispute between the North and the South to the decisions of these true men. As we have said, the subjects were too numerous to admit of mention at present–; we may recur to them again.—San Antonio Herald.
Tyler asks if this speech was made after Emancipation. Kellison confirms that and explains that the war ended in May of 1865. Judge Hancock is discussing how to move forward. Blacks cannot yet vote. In his speech Hancock made clear his opinion of blacks by comparing them to mules in terms of when they should be allowed to vote. This sets Tyler off, who talks about the rampant hypocrisy among pro-slavery whites: Blacks were good enough to take care of their homes and their children, feed their families, and be available for sex but shouldn't have freedom and be able to vote. Judge Hancock had fathered children with a black woman, paid for his son's education, apparently bought him a ranch, and maybe even paid to move the family out of Texas, but still could compare blacks to mules. What it came down to was that the white Southerners wanted to hold on to the power they had had.
The narrator steps in with additional information for the only time this episode. In 1870 black men gained the right to vote and made other steady gains in freedom. This caused increased racial tension, which led to a backlash from white supremacists and to the rise of the KKK. Intimidation and violence toward blacks rose, along with lynchings of black men. By the early 1880's the rights that had been granted to blacks were being taken back. The pushback created a dangerous environment in the South, which would have affected Hugh Hancock.
Tyler wonders why Hugh would have gone back to Texas. It was a very dangerous time to be black in the South. Kellison says that they might find more information in newspapers and that they should go upstairs. They find a lone laptop sitting all by itself on a table, ready and waiting for them. Tyler gets to visit Newspapers.com for a second time, as Kellison says guilelessly that it has an "amazing array of newspapers from this time period." She has Tyler use the advanced search and type in hugh hancock, and Austin, Texas for the location, then "suggests" that Tyler "pick a range maybe to look for" of 1875–1885 and "let's see what pops up." (Aren't there scriptwriters anywhere in Hollywood who need work? They have to be able to write better than this.)
So yes, surprise, surprise, something comes up that Kellison points Tyler to: a short note in the Austin Weekly Statesman of June 19, 1884. On the front page, in a section titled "Recorder's Court", is an item that says Hugh Hancock pled guilty to assault and battery and was fined $10 plus court costs.
There is no other information. Tyler comments that if you were biracial in Texas at that time that you easily might encounter provocative situations. Tyler doesn't ask, but Kellison says she thinks the next step should be for her to go to the Travis County Archives, which has many court records and other documents, to see if there's something about the case.
In this departure interlude, Tyler says it was jarring to find out that her 3x-great-grandfather was a white supremacist. He was shameless, and she is disgusted by it. Old John provided Hugh a ranch, but why go back to a place where he would be so unwelcome? Even though Hugh was fined for the assault and battery, she doesn't think that's the entire story. She figures that if you were a proud black man in Texas in the late 1880's, sometimes someone would need a box in the mouth. I can't disagree with that!
As she drives to the Travis County Archives, Tyler says that she doesn't know yet who Hugh Berry Hancock is. She has a lot of information, but she needs to learn more. At the archives she meets Christine Sismondo, a social historian from York University, who says she has good news and bad news. She has not been able to find any additional information about the assault and battery case because no court records from prior to 1890 have survived. (That's definitely disappointing, but then why bother making such a big deal of the newspaper item?) The good news is that she has found something else. She gives Tyler a copy of a page from the 1885 Austin city directory, which includes listings for saloons. Tyler has a lot of fun reading the names of the bars and giving running commentary. She hits the Black Republican at 424 E. Pecan and thinks that sounds like a great name, then notices that the owner is Hugh Hancock. (No comment is made about the "(c)" following his name, indicating he is "colored.")
Tyler seems to think it's pretty cool that her ancestor owned a saloon and wonders if Black Elephant could have been a reference to the Republican Party. Sismondo says that the elephant was established as the symbol of the party in about 1875, so it's a good possibility. She adds that a lot of politics happened in saloons: talking about it, organizing, rallies, and sometimes being used as polling stations. Tyler comments that Old John was against blacks being able to vote, so Hugh naming the saloon the Black Elephant could have been a grand act of defiance against his father.
Sismondo brings up the fact that saloons were important in the black community because blacks were not able to meet in a town hall. Instead they got together at church and in saloons. Tyler wonders if maybe Hugh had come back to Texas to help advance black rights. Sismondo goes on to say that saloons like this became targets for white supremacists and were shut down repeatedly, because whites did not want blacks to move up to the middle class.
All of this led Tyler to question whether Hugh was active in politics. Sismondo says she doesn't know about Texas politics but that she has a colleague who can help. She adds that she has something else interesting about the Black Elephant but needs to know if Tyler has time for a field trip. (C'mon, say no!) They go to a building for which carefully chosen camera angles guarantee no identifying information is shown on screen. It was the location of the Black Elephant saloon, it's the original building — and it's still a bar. Tyler is thrilled and says, "It's just about the coolest thing I've ever seen."
(The bar is called Buckshot. The address is the same, but the street was renamed East 6th. Buckshot has a Facebook page but doesn't appear to have its own Web site. It is listed with the Austin Convention and Visitors Bureau, though.)
Coming out of this segment, Tyler has still been thinking about why Hugh Hancock came back to Texas. Now she wonders if one reason he did so because he felt it was his right to live freely and openly in the state he ws born in, to take his personal freedoms and control them himself.
The next segment had to be the following day, because Tyler talks about how yesterday she visited the bar. Bars were places for people to gather and where they could talk about politics. Maybe Hancock had helped organize politics. Had he been involved in politics himself? Or maybe been a conduit for others to organize?
Sismondo had said that she had a colleague who could help Tyler look into possible political aspects of Hancock's life. That colleague turns out to be Tyina (somehow pronounced "too-WAN-na") Steptoe, a historian at the University of Arizona, who meets Tyler at the George Washington Carver Museum's Genealogy Center (not credited on screen, but I'm pretty good at reading tiny writing). Tyler tells Steptoe she wants to know what kind of person Hancock was. Was he involved in politics? Was he a Republican? Is that why he called his saloon the Black Elephant?
Steptoe hands Tyler a rolled-up piece of paper, which turns out to be an oversized copy of a newspaper page. The New York Tribune of March 29, 1896 published an article about the Republican Party national convention in St. Louis, which included a list of the delegates from around the country. And yes, Hugh B. Hancock is on that list (near the bottom of the image below). The women note that Hancock is listed as colored but not that he voted for a losing candidate. (This newspaper is actually on Newspapers.com, but I guess they figured that the oversized copy was more dramatic.)
In 1896 Hancock was about 41 years old. He probably had family, because Tyler's grandmother, Hugh Ella, was born about 1896. (And if the research had included a full census survey of the family, they'd probably know more about that.)
Tyler asks how involved blacks were in Republican politics at this point. Steptoe explains that by the 1890's the Republican Party had stepped back somewhat from its platform of rights for blacks. She says it was rare to see blacks play a major part in party politics at this time and that many Southern states had been "disfranchising" (actually disenfranchising) black voters. It is significant that Hancock was a delegate in 1896, which made him one of the last black men active in party politics for a while.
Tyler wants to know if there's anything after 1896, and Steptoe says she has one more document. This is a copy of Hancock's obituary from the Pocatello (Idaho) Tribune. The date is not shown, but Steptoe says it's from 1910. (Unfortunately, Idaho didn't start recording deaths at the state level until July 1911.) This is another paper I can't find anywhere online, so I've transcribed the text for everyone.
Funeral Tomorrow.—Mrs. H. B. Hancock and Miss B. M. Hancock, wife and daughter of H. B. Hancock, who died here recently at the Pocatello hospital, arrived in the Gate City to take charge of the remains. Mrs. Hancock has charge of the department of domestic science in one of the state institutions of Texas. The body will be buried here temporarily. The funeral will take place at 2 p. m. Thursday, from Lindquist's chapel. All friends are invited. Mr. Hancock was a man who at one time was held in the highest esteem by the people of Austin, Tex. He was born there in June, 1855, and graduated with honor at Oberlin, Ohio. After leaving there he returned to Austin and taught school, finally embarking in business and in the zenith of his power, financial and political, he was elected a member of the board of aldermen, and chairman of the congressional district, a position which he filled with credit and distinction for ten years. He married Miss Susie James, a reputable and estimable lady of Austin, November, 1879. She survives him and four children, the issue of a happy marriage.
Tyler realizes Hancock was only 55 years old when he died. She also notes that his wife and daughter came to get him and remembered the family information that he and Susie had separated after many years. (Nothing is said about the reference to Hancock graduating with honors from Oberlin, which the previous research indicates is incorrect. But almost everyone's life improves in an obituary.) She says, "Every time I learn something I want to learn more," but Steptoe has no more documents for her. What she does have is an address — 1717 West Avenue — which she says will be of interest to Tyler.
As she drives to West Avenue Tyler thinks about what she has learned regarding Hugh Hancock. He was successful, enterprising, brave, and pioneering, qualities which may have trickled down to her.
At the address Steptoe gave her is a house, in front of which is a marker from the Texas Historical Commission. It is the Hugh B. Hancock House!
Tyler appears less excited about the house, which she calls a lovely discovery, than she was about the bar. She says it's cool to be at his house and nice to know that Austin remembers him. She looks at the house and walks around the outside a little, but that was it.
Tyler enjoyed finding out about Hancock, a man who refused to be held back. She herself has lived a relatively unfettered life; if she has wanted to do something, she has gone out and done it. It's nice to know she descends from someone with the same attitude. She feels very lucky.
I was a little surprised that the program did not visit inside either Hancock's old bar or his former house, both of which would probably have been interesting for Tyler. We've certainly seen people do something similar for previous episodes, such as with Angie Harmon and Melissa Etheridge. I wonder if they were not pursued by the producers, or if the current owners didn't want to participate. It could be that neither building's interior had anything left that was relevant to Hancock's history with it. The celebrity and the historic person being black, and the location being Texas, however, I'm a little more inclined toward the owners not wanting to be involved. That was also in my mind as far as identifying Hugh's mother was concerned. Since Old John Hancock was such a prominent individual, and he apparently funded Hugh at different times in his life, I would expect that he probably kept good records of his financial transactions. If the story about Hugh arriving in Oberlin with his supposed mother and brother were true, then a slave who suddenly disappeared from Old John's taxable lists in Texas at that time would be a good candidate for the mother, wouldn't she? But maybe the family has that information and didn't want to share? I remember feeling something like that was the case with the brick wall on Emmitt Smith's research the very first season of WDYTYA.
The political story the program chose to highlight was when Hugh was a delegate to the national convention, but nothing was shown about when he ran for an office himself. In 1882 he ran for the position of hide inspector in Travis County, as reported in the Austin Statesman of November 9 and 16. An article from September 14 said that the contest was between Hugh and the incumbent, Richard Warren, but they both lost to someone named Sheehan.
I was happy to see that Ancestry has retired its commercial showing the wrong draft registration, but now everything's pushing its DNA testing. When will people learn that it's just not that reliable for a lot of information (or, as Judy Russell says, it's only "cocktail party conversation")? On the other hand, TLC's other programming is just so awful, the Ancestry DNA commercials shine in comparison.
It's starting to look as though TLC has a formula of sorts for its mix of celebrities, although it isn't consistent. The first two seasons everyone was white, but since then we've had one person of color each time (Julie Chen, Alfre Woodard, and Aisha Tyler). The first three seasons had an LGBT celeb (Jim Parsons, Cynthia Nixon, and Melissa Etheridge) but none in season 4 or 5. Every season except 2 has had at least one celebrity who has known Jewish ancestry (Chelsea Handler, Tony Goldwyn, Ginnifer Goodwin, Katey Sagal, and Lea Michele). I realize a lot is dependent on what they find, whether a celebrity wants to follow through, etc., but it's interesting to see what kinds of bases the program is trying to cover.
This season's celebrities for the most part are unknown to me. I know who Molly Ringwald and Katey Sagal are, and that's it. I guess I'll be learning about the others as their stories are aired.
The teaser for Aisha Tyler, the season opener, said that she would be learning about her mother's family history. One ancestor had shocking beliefs, while another refused to be held down. We would see an extraordinary story about celebrating victory and courage over adversity.
I now know that Aisha Tyler has had an accomplished, wide-ranging entertainment career as a comedian, actor, host, producer, author, and director. She apparently first made a mark in Friends (a program I never saw while it was being aired in first run, and oh!, she was in a total of nine episodes) and who is also known for her work on The Talk (never seen it), Whose Line Is It Anyway? (only watched the original, British, better version; apparently she's hosting the third iteration), and Criminal Minds (used to watch it but stopped a few years ago, well before she joined the cast). She also has a Podcast called Girl on Guy (never heard of it). (Yes, I feel old, thank you.) She lives and works in Los Angeles (at least I used to live there!).
Tyler begins by telling us that she is a workaholic. She's curious about how she arrived at her outlook on life and figures it must be a legacy of the relatives who came before her. I found it interesting that we did not see any of her family members in the episode.
Tyler was born in San Francisco, California. Her parents are James Herman Tyler and Robin Adair Gregory, both of whom were dream-driven. When Tyler was about 10 years old her parents divorced. (She did not mention it in the episode, but her Wikipedia write-up says that she lived with her father after that.) Her parents were very different: Her father was a hard-driving, rugged, motorcycle-riding badass, while her mother was an elegant, artistic, intellectual painter who attended Howard. (Yeah, that's pretty different.)
Tyler has heard a fair amount of family stories about her mother's side. She realizes that some are probably true, while others are likely apocryphal. Her mother suggested that she write to her great-aunt Sheila Gregory Thomas, her mother's father's sister, for information, as she is the family historian. Tyler has apparently received a letter from her aunt in response, although the envelope she opens on camera has no writing or stamp on it. (Maybe little elves delivered it.) She reads portions of the letter, but I have transcribed it in its entirety here. The letter was typed and unsigned.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
Dear Aisha
It's so exciting to know that you will be on a journey to uncover further information regarding our family history! There is so much more I am curious about, so I hope you'll be able to find the answers. Meanwhile, I believe the following information may be helpful to you.
My father, Thomas Montgomery Gregory — your maternal great grand father — graduated from Harvard in 1910, at a time when, as you can imagine, there were very few Black students.
He went on to teach English, drama, and debating at Howard University, and also founded and directed the Howard Players, a significant African American theater troupe. His father, James Monroe Gregory — your maternal 2x great grandfather — was born free in Virginia in 1849, graduated from Howard in 1872, and went on to become an important advocate for Black education in America. He was a protégé of Frederick Douglass.
My mother, Hugh Ella Hancock Gregory, who of course was your maternal great grand mother, was born in 1896. She was also well-educated — she attended Fisk University, which as you know, is a Historically Black College like Howard.
Sadly, although our research on our family ancestry has produced a great amount of detail regarding the Gregory side, my mother's history is fuzzier.
Her father, your 2x great grand father, Hugh Berry Hancock, attended school in Oberlin, Ohio in the 1860s and early 1870s. After many years of marriage and raising a family, Hugh and hiw wife, Susie James, separated.
When Hugh died, my mother was just a teenager and she had not seen him for some time. These circumstances left a gap in our personal knowledge about him. My theory is that Hugh became something of a rolling stone and wanted everyone to roll along with him, but that Susie wanted more stability for their family. I have enclosed a photo of Hugh, the only one our family has left.
There is a marvelous proverb, which I believe is African: "When an old person dies, it is like a library burning down." I wish I had asked my mother more about Hugh before she passed away.
Happy hunting, Aisha!
Aunt Sheila
OOXX
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
Tyler did not read the sections about James Monroe Gregory, the "fuzzier" comment about Sheila's mother's side of the family, Hugh possibly being a "rolling stone", or the paragraph about the proverb (which has been attributed to several origins, not only Africa) out loud.
Tyler notices that Hugh, who is clearly light-complected in the photo, looks a lot like her own mother. She is excited and loves adventure, and is looking forward to learning about the people who came before her. She "decides" (i.e., the producers told her) to go to Oberlin, Ohio, the only place she knows that Hugh lived, to start her research. (Of course, she doesn't actually know that he lived there, only that her great-aunt said he was there. But we'll take Aunt Sheila at her word, won't we?)
She goes to the Mudd Center at Oberlin College, probably to the library, and meets with Christi Smith, whose unusual on-screen credit reads "Author, Reparation and Reconciliation, Oberlin College." (She was a visiting professor at Oberlin as of the writing of this post, but the book was published by the University of North Carolina Press.) She tells Smith that she knows her great-great-grandfather Hugh Berry Hancock attended Oberlin (which she doesn't; again, she was merely told that by her aunt) and that she wants to learn more about his time there. But we wouldn't be at Oberlin if Hancock hadn't been there himself at some time, right? So Smith brings out a college catalog from 1872–1873. An alphabetical list of names includes Hugh B. Hancock of Austin, Texas.
This is Tyler's first surprise: She had no idea her ancestor was from Texas. Smith then turns to the page for the department Hancock was in, which was the Preparatory Department. She explains it prepared students for college, the ministry, and other areas. The students were older than high school but not quite college-aged (my mental analogy was what junior colleges used to be like).
From this the two women go to the computer and Ancestry.com (only eight minutes into the episode!) to learn more about Hancock. Smith has Tyler go to the main census search page and search for Hugh Hancock in Oberlin, Ohio with exact match off. They get seven results, the top two of which appear to be Tyler's Hugh Hancock. (That's funny, because when I do that exact same search, I have 456,202 results. Clicking on 1800's only brings the total down to 273,047, so I don't know how they got it down to seven. At least when I restricted it to 1800's the two with Tyler's Hugh Hancock were at the top of my list also.)
Smith suggests that Tyler look at the earlier census first (not the right way to do research!). The page shows a 5-year-old Hugh "Handcock" (actually transcribed by Ancestry as Handtock). (Hey, that means he was only 17 years old when he was at Oberlin in 1872! Hmm, that sounds like high-school age to me.) Looking down the "race" column, Tyler discovers Hancock is listed as mulatto, which really surprises her. She comments that it's a word not used much nowadays and that the politically correct term would be bi- or multiracial. Smith points out that the main thing to keep in mind is that it means he had at least one white ancestor.
![]() |
| United States 1860 Census, Oberlin, Lorain County, Ohio page 71 (handwritten)/218 (stemped), enumerated June 23, 1860 |
The next thing that Tyler fixes on is that Hancock was born in Texas, which means he was born into slavery, but that he is now living in Ohio, a free state. He is in a household with several other people, including some Pattersons, but with no one else of the same surname. Smith explains that the Pattersons were a black family who ran a boarding house. They had students and others who lived there.
Tyler looks distressed and says it's clear from the "register" (census) that Hancock was not living with any parent or relative (which is not actually true; the 1860 census does not list relationships, so someone in the household could have been related and simply not had the same name, such as a remarried mother, a cousin, etc.). She wants to know how he got to Oberlin from Texas. Smith tells her that Oberlin was an important point on the Underground Railroad, and that in 1860 about 20% of the population was black.
From that Smith makes the leap to suggest that maybe someone had posted an ad about Hancock if he had run away. (Um, a 5-year-old running away by himself? Yeah, she's reaching.) She tells Tyler to search on Newspapers.com (yes, owned by Ancestry) to see what she can find. She has Tyler search for hugh hancock and the word "mulatto" in Oberlin, Ohio. (No, of course she doesn't know what Tyler will find! How could you think such a thing?) Amazingly enough (you're surprised, right?), the New Castle Index of New Castle, Pennsylvania, dated November 3, 1880, has a short note about Hancock and the possibilities being discussed about his parentage:
![]() |
| New Castle Index, November 3, 1880, page 4 |
The two men being bandied about as the possible father were General W. S. Hancock (the W. S. stood for Winfield Scott, a name I came across in my Emma Schafer research) and Old John Hancock. The general was at the time a U.S. presidential candidate for the Republican Party. Tyler says that the Republicans at that time were the socially progressive party, which Smith confirms, but then she says that the party was opposed to rights for blacks, which I could not understand in the context of what they were discussing. About Old John Hancock, Smith says, "I've got nothing!" At the time he was probably well known enough that no explanation was needed in the article, but that doesn't help now.
The article doesn't draw any conclusions about which man might actually be Hancock's father, so Tyler asks how she can find out which was her 3x-great-grandfather (without allowing for the possibility that it might have been neither). Smith points out that the dateline for the article is Cleveland, Ohio and that the article says a reporter for the Leader, a Cleveland newspaper, was investigating the question. She tells Tyler that she should go to the Western Reserve Historical Society in Cleveland to see if maybe a longer article was published in the Leader.
As Tyler leaves Oberlin, she says she has questions about Hancock and which man, the general or "Old John", was his father. She's hoping for the general, not Old John, whom she is sure was famous for holding up the corner of the bar. She also figures that it will probably be the general because that would make for better television. (Ah, I see I'm not the only person who understands "TV logic.")
We next see Tyler in Cleveland at the Western Reserve Historical Society, where she meets Daina Ramey Berry (we saw her in the Alfre Woodard episode). Berry has a real, historic copy of the Cleveland Leader from October 29, 1880 for Tyler to look at. (And I was happy to see they did not handle the newspaper with conservator's gloves.) As Tyler pages through the issue looking for her great-great-grandfather's name, she finds it at the top of a page in large type. (The article itself runs the entire length of the page and over to the next column. It's available online at GenealogyBank.com, but I guess Ancestry was only willing to allow them on screen, albeit uncredited, in one episode.)
![]() |
| Cleveland Leader, October 29, 1880, page 5 |
Tyler reads bits and pieces of the article. The upshot is that after the Leader reporter researched the matter, Old John Hancock seems to be the father of Hugh, rather than the presidential candidate. The article also has some information about Hugh Hancock's apparent mother and brother, with whom he was said to have come to Oberlin. The brother died and the mother was not seen again; no one seemed to know whether she had died or left Oberlin. And somehow Hugh Hancock ended up in the Patterson boarding house.
Tyler is struck by the tragedy that Hancock had already experienced by the time he was five, with his brother dying and his mother gone. She also wonders how the family would have gotten to Oberlin. Berry suggests that one way would have been via the Underground Railroad, but it's also possible that Hancock's father might have paid for them to leave. Tyler had been hoping to learn the name of her 3x-great-grandmother also, but it is not given in the article. Berry says she was probably a slave. (Do any documents survive from Old John? If so, did the family not feel inclined to work with the show's producers? I'll revisit this point later.)
Tyler at this point was refreshingly direct. Whereas previous celebrities, the first time they are confronted with some evidence of their ancestor's enslavement, have been very dramatic, she simply matter-of-factly said it was true and there's no whitewashing the fact. The "cruel but intimate institution" of slavery meant that if the mother was a slave, her children were slaves.
Taking the article at its word, Berry tells Tyler that to learn more on Old John, she'll need to go to Texas. The Texas State Library in Austin should have information about him, as he was a state congressman and socially prominent. Tyler finds some solace in the fact that Austin has a "treasure trove of barbecue."
Tyler is happy that she has learned the name of her 3x-great-grandfather. The last 48 hours have been exciting and overwhelming. She's learned some good and bad: Old John was a congressman, but she believes he was a slave owner. She isn't devastated, she just wants to know more.
Something odd that caught my eye was when they showed a sign outside the historical society building. It had the name, Western Reserve Historical Society, and the address, 10825 East Boulevard, and then what looked like two lines of text that were blurred out of focus. It's a public sign; it probably has something like the hours and maybe the phone number of the society. Why in the world would they need to obscure that?
Anyway, off to Texas we go! As she heads toward the Texas State Library and Archives, Tyler says that Berry recommended she speak to Kim Kellison regarding her search for John Hancock. Of course, Kellison (a "Historian of the South" at Baylor University) is inside waiting to greet her. Tyler tells her she wants to know more about Old John, his life, and his relationship with Hugh. Kellison has of course found something: an article from the December 20, 1865 issue of the Galveston Weekly News, which they look at on microfilm. I can't find that newspaper online at Chronicling America, GenealogyBank, Newspaper Archive, Newspapers.com, or anywhere else, but here's a transcription of the article.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
Judge Hancock's Speech
In compliance with the request of many of our citizens the Honorable John Hancock delivered an address to the people of San Antonio, last evening, suggesting many idea[s] for them to cogitate upon, now that they will soon be called upon to act for themselves in a very important capacity. We have not time to more than briefly allude to several of the prominent subjects that he discussed, nor have we the space in order to give justice to the speaker. The address was a masterly effort and we do not think that we go far amiss in saying that the sentiments entertained by Judge Hancock met a response in the breast of every man present who had a desire for his country's welfare.
He thought that so far as disagreements in regard to the war and what brought it on were concerned we should let the past bury the dead, seize the present, and calmly and dispassionately consider the future. He was anxious to get rid of the military, saying that whenever it became necessary to rule this country by force of arms, from that day would date the downfall of the Republic. He considered the Provisional government equally "damnable," and although approving the course of the administration of Andrew Johnson as far as it had been developed, yet he thought the people of Texas, who were the only ones that did not lay down their arms at the point of the bayonet, had been badly treated in not being allowed three months ago to assume their original position in the Union.
He illustrated his views on the "negro suffrage" question, when called upon to express them by saying that when he became in favor of letting a mule vote, that he would give the suffrage to the negro. At the close he paid a glowing tribute to Lee, S--ney Jackson, Stonewall Jackson, Sherman and Grant. There was never a time during war at which he would not have been willing to have referred the matters in dispute between the North and the South to the decisions of these true men. As we have said, the subjects were too numerous to admit of mention at present–; we may recur to them again.—San Antonio Herald.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
Tyler asks if this speech was made after Emancipation. Kellison confirms that and explains that the war ended in May of 1865. Judge Hancock is discussing how to move forward. Blacks cannot yet vote. In his speech Hancock made clear his opinion of blacks by comparing them to mules in terms of when they should be allowed to vote. This sets Tyler off, who talks about the rampant hypocrisy among pro-slavery whites: Blacks were good enough to take care of their homes and their children, feed their families, and be available for sex but shouldn't have freedom and be able to vote. Judge Hancock had fathered children with a black woman, paid for his son's education, apparently bought him a ranch, and maybe even paid to move the family out of Texas, but still could compare blacks to mules. What it came down to was that the white Southerners wanted to hold on to the power they had had.
The narrator steps in with additional information for the only time this episode. In 1870 black men gained the right to vote and made other steady gains in freedom. This caused increased racial tension, which led to a backlash from white supremacists and to the rise of the KKK. Intimidation and violence toward blacks rose, along with lynchings of black men. By the early 1880's the rights that had been granted to blacks were being taken back. The pushback created a dangerous environment in the South, which would have affected Hugh Hancock.
Tyler wonders why Hugh would have gone back to Texas. It was a very dangerous time to be black in the South. Kellison says that they might find more information in newspapers and that they should go upstairs. They find a lone laptop sitting all by itself on a table, ready and waiting for them. Tyler gets to visit Newspapers.com for a second time, as Kellison says guilelessly that it has an "amazing array of newspapers from this time period." She has Tyler use the advanced search and type in hugh hancock, and Austin, Texas for the location, then "suggests" that Tyler "pick a range maybe to look for" of 1875–1885 and "let's see what pops up." (Aren't there scriptwriters anywhere in Hollywood who need work? They have to be able to write better than this.)
So yes, surprise, surprise, something comes up that Kellison points Tyler to: a short note in the Austin Weekly Statesman of June 19, 1884. On the front page, in a section titled "Recorder's Court", is an item that says Hugh Hancock pled guilty to assault and battery and was fined $10 plus court costs.
| Austin Weekly Statesman, June 19, 1884, page 1 |
There is no other information. Tyler comments that if you were biracial in Texas at that time that you easily might encounter provocative situations. Tyler doesn't ask, but Kellison says she thinks the next step should be for her to go to the Travis County Archives, which has many court records and other documents, to see if there's something about the case.
In this departure interlude, Tyler says it was jarring to find out that her 3x-great-grandfather was a white supremacist. He was shameless, and she is disgusted by it. Old John provided Hugh a ranch, but why go back to a place where he would be so unwelcome? Even though Hugh was fined for the assault and battery, she doesn't think that's the entire story. She figures that if you were a proud black man in Texas in the late 1880's, sometimes someone would need a box in the mouth. I can't disagree with that!
As she drives to the Travis County Archives, Tyler says that she doesn't know yet who Hugh Berry Hancock is. She has a lot of information, but she needs to learn more. At the archives she meets Christine Sismondo, a social historian from York University, who says she has good news and bad news. She has not been able to find any additional information about the assault and battery case because no court records from prior to 1890 have survived. (That's definitely disappointing, but then why bother making such a big deal of the newspaper item?) The good news is that she has found something else. She gives Tyler a copy of a page from the 1885 Austin city directory, which includes listings for saloons. Tyler has a lot of fun reading the names of the bars and giving running commentary. She hits the Black Republican at 424 E. Pecan and thinks that sounds like a great name, then notices that the owner is Hugh Hancock. (No comment is made about the "(c)" following his name, indicating he is "colored.")
Tyler seems to think it's pretty cool that her ancestor owned a saloon and wonders if Black Elephant could have been a reference to the Republican Party. Sismondo says that the elephant was established as the symbol of the party in about 1875, so it's a good possibility. She adds that a lot of politics happened in saloons: talking about it, organizing, rallies, and sometimes being used as polling stations. Tyler comments that Old John was against blacks being able to vote, so Hugh naming the saloon the Black Elephant could have been a grand act of defiance against his father.
Sismondo brings up the fact that saloons were important in the black community because blacks were not able to meet in a town hall. Instead they got together at church and in saloons. Tyler wonders if maybe Hugh had come back to Texas to help advance black rights. Sismondo goes on to say that saloons like this became targets for white supremacists and were shut down repeatedly, because whites did not want blacks to move up to the middle class.
All of this led Tyler to question whether Hugh was active in politics. Sismondo says she doesn't know about Texas politics but that she has a colleague who can help. She adds that she has something else interesting about the Black Elephant but needs to know if Tyler has time for a field trip. (C'mon, say no!) They go to a building for which carefully chosen camera angles guarantee no identifying information is shown on screen. It was the location of the Black Elephant saloon, it's the original building — and it's still a bar. Tyler is thrilled and says, "It's just about the coolest thing I've ever seen."
(The bar is called Buckshot. The address is the same, but the street was renamed East 6th. Buckshot has a Facebook page but doesn't appear to have its own Web site. It is listed with the Austin Convention and Visitors Bureau, though.)
Coming out of this segment, Tyler has still been thinking about why Hugh Hancock came back to Texas. Now she wonders if one reason he did so because he felt it was his right to live freely and openly in the state he ws born in, to take his personal freedoms and control them himself.
The next segment had to be the following day, because Tyler talks about how yesterday she visited the bar. Bars were places for people to gather and where they could talk about politics. Maybe Hancock had helped organize politics. Had he been involved in politics himself? Or maybe been a conduit for others to organize?
Sismondo had said that she had a colleague who could help Tyler look into possible political aspects of Hancock's life. That colleague turns out to be Tyina (somehow pronounced "too-WAN-na") Steptoe, a historian at the University of Arizona, who meets Tyler at the George Washington Carver Museum's Genealogy Center (not credited on screen, but I'm pretty good at reading tiny writing). Tyler tells Steptoe she wants to know what kind of person Hancock was. Was he involved in politics? Was he a Republican? Is that why he called his saloon the Black Elephant?
Steptoe hands Tyler a rolled-up piece of paper, which turns out to be an oversized copy of a newspaper page. The New York Tribune of March 29, 1896 published an article about the Republican Party national convention in St. Louis, which included a list of the delegates from around the country. And yes, Hugh B. Hancock is on that list (near the bottom of the image below). The women note that Hancock is listed as colored but not that he voted for a losing candidate. (This newspaper is actually on Newspapers.com, but I guess they figured that the oversized copy was more dramatic.)
![]() |
| New York (Daily) Tribune, March 29, 1896, page 3 |
In 1896 Hancock was about 41 years old. He probably had family, because Tyler's grandmother, Hugh Ella, was born about 1896. (And if the research had included a full census survey of the family, they'd probably know more about that.)
Tyler asks how involved blacks were in Republican politics at this point. Steptoe explains that by the 1890's the Republican Party had stepped back somewhat from its platform of rights for blacks. She says it was rare to see blacks play a major part in party politics at this time and that many Southern states had been "disfranchising" (actually disenfranchising) black voters. It is significant that Hancock was a delegate in 1896, which made him one of the last black men active in party politics for a while.
Tyler wants to know if there's anything after 1896, and Steptoe says she has one more document. This is a copy of Hancock's obituary from the Pocatello (Idaho) Tribune. The date is not shown, but Steptoe says it's from 1910. (Unfortunately, Idaho didn't start recording deaths at the state level until July 1911.) This is another paper I can't find anywhere online, so I've transcribed the text for everyone.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
Funeral Tomorrow.—Mrs. H. B. Hancock and Miss B. M. Hancock, wife and daughter of H. B. Hancock, who died here recently at the Pocatello hospital, arrived in the Gate City to take charge of the remains. Mrs. Hancock has charge of the department of domestic science in one of the state institutions of Texas. The body will be buried here temporarily. The funeral will take place at 2 p. m. Thursday, from Lindquist's chapel. All friends are invited. Mr. Hancock was a man who at one time was held in the highest esteem by the people of Austin, Tex. He was born there in June, 1855, and graduated with honor at Oberlin, Ohio. After leaving there he returned to Austin and taught school, finally embarking in business and in the zenith of his power, financial and political, he was elected a member of the board of aldermen, and chairman of the congressional district, a position which he filled with credit and distinction for ten years. He married Miss Susie James, a reputable and estimable lady of Austin, November, 1879. She survives him and four children, the issue of a happy marriage.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
Tyler realizes Hancock was only 55 years old when he died. She also notes that his wife and daughter came to get him and remembered the family information that he and Susie had separated after many years. (Nothing is said about the reference to Hancock graduating with honors from Oberlin, which the previous research indicates is incorrect. But almost everyone's life improves in an obituary.) She says, "Every time I learn something I want to learn more," but Steptoe has no more documents for her. What she does have is an address — 1717 West Avenue — which she says will be of interest to Tyler.
As she drives to West Avenue Tyler thinks about what she has learned regarding Hugh Hancock. He was successful, enterprising, brave, and pioneering, qualities which may have trickled down to her.
At the address Steptoe gave her is a house, in front of which is a marker from the Texas Historical Commission. It is the Hugh B. Hancock House!
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
Texas Historical Commission
Official Historic Marker
Hugh B. Hancock House
Built in 1886, this house was originally located on 7th Street in the Robertson Hill area of East Austin. It was constructed for Hugh B. Hancock, a successful black businessman of the city. In 1904 it was sold to German native Charles Frederick Mann, a local railroad engineer, and it remained in his family until 1959. Built in the Victorian style with classical ornamentation, the residence was moved to this location in 1979.
Record Texas Historic Landmark — 1981
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
Tyler appears less excited about the house, which she calls a lovely discovery, than she was about the bar. She says it's cool to be at his house and nice to know that Austin remembers him. She looks at the house and walks around the outside a little, but that was it.
Tyler enjoyed finding out about Hancock, a man who refused to be held back. She herself has lived a relatively unfettered life; if she has wanted to do something, she has gone out and done it. It's nice to know she descends from someone with the same attitude. She feels very lucky.
I was a little surprised that the program did not visit inside either Hancock's old bar or his former house, both of which would probably have been interesting for Tyler. We've certainly seen people do something similar for previous episodes, such as with Angie Harmon and Melissa Etheridge. I wonder if they were not pursued by the producers, or if the current owners didn't want to participate. It could be that neither building's interior had anything left that was relevant to Hancock's history with it. The celebrity and the historic person being black, and the location being Texas, however, I'm a little more inclined toward the owners not wanting to be involved. That was also in my mind as far as identifying Hugh's mother was concerned. Since Old John Hancock was such a prominent individual, and he apparently funded Hugh at different times in his life, I would expect that he probably kept good records of his financial transactions. If the story about Hugh arriving in Oberlin with his supposed mother and brother were true, then a slave who suddenly disappeared from Old John's taxable lists in Texas at that time would be a good candidate for the mother, wouldn't she? But maybe the family has that information and didn't want to share? I remember feeling something like that was the case with the brick wall on Emmitt Smith's research the very first season of WDYTYA.
The political story the program chose to highlight was when Hugh was a delegate to the national convention, but nothing was shown about when he ran for an office himself. In 1882 he ran for the position of hide inspector in Travis County, as reported in the Austin Statesman of November 9 and 16. An article from September 14 said that the contest was between Hugh and the incumbent, Richard Warren, but they both lost to someone named Sheehan.
I was happy to see that Ancestry has retired its commercial showing the wrong draft registration, but now everything's pushing its DNA testing. When will people learn that it's just not that reliable for a lot of information (or, as Judy Russell says, it's only "cocktail party conversation")? On the other hand, TLC's other programming is just so awful, the Ancestry DNA commercials shine in comparison.
It's starting to look as though TLC has a formula of sorts for its mix of celebrities, although it isn't consistent. The first two seasons everyone was white, but since then we've had one person of color each time (Julie Chen, Alfre Woodard, and Aisha Tyler). The first three seasons had an LGBT celeb (Jim Parsons, Cynthia Nixon, and Melissa Etheridge) but none in season 4 or 5. Every season except 2 has had at least one celebrity who has known Jewish ancestry (Chelsea Handler, Tony Goldwyn, Ginnifer Goodwin, Katey Sagal, and Lea Michele). I realize a lot is dependent on what they find, whether a celebrity wants to follow through, etc., but it's interesting to see what kinds of bases the program is trying to cover.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)





















