I knew I would end up doing volunteer work in genealogy after my move to Oregon, because volunteering is just something I do, and most of it nowadays has something to do with genealogy.
Less than a week after I arrived I called the Family History Center in Gresham, a mere three miles from my house, and asked if they were looking for volunteers. No surprise, I was told, "Yes!" I think I started my Tuesday morning shift the week after that. It's a lot slower pace than when I was at the Oakland Family History Center in California, though. We usually have only one or two patrons come in during the four-hour shift, and most of the time the help they need is computer-oriented rather than for research. I'm still trying to figure out ways to "market" the FHC to get more people to come in and use our resources.
I didn't realize I hadn't posted about this when it started, and somehow a year has passed already. Last fall I took on the job of coordinating the African American Special Interest Group (AA SIG for short) at the Genealogical Forum of Oregon. The group began the year before, soon after I moved here, and I attended regularly. The person who started the SIG determined she was trying to do too many things and asked for someone to take over leading the group. Apparently I was the only person who volunteered. I have had a small amount of pushback, because I am not black, but neither of the two people who complained was willing to do the work and everyone else is fine with me, so I'm still doing it. I've been able to get some good speakers, and we've built a pretty solid group.
At the 2018 Federation of Genealogical Societies (FGS) conference, one of the sessions I attended was about records access for the genealogical community. The primary genealogical group that keeps an eye on such issues is the Records Preservation and Access Committee (RPAC), which is a joint effort between FGS (which is now part of NGS), the International Association of Jewish Genealogical Societies, and the National Genealogical Society (NGS). I felt so inspired by the presentation that I volunteered to be the contact person for the state of Oregon, which did not have one at the time. One of my responsibilities is to let the committee know about "records access and preservation activities within the state, including both problems (issues) and successes." So if you hear about any records access problems in Oregon, please let me know!
The most recent position I've taken on is Vice President of the Jewish Genealogical Society of Oregon (JGSO). The board voted me in a mere week ago. My primary job is handling programming for our meetings. So far I've attended only one board meeting, although I have put together a long list of ideas for future programs. All I need now is the schedule for the year (which someone else is handling), so I can try to find speakers!
Genealogy still relies heavily on volunteers in so many ways for societies to function. I'm very happy I am able to help these groups.
What genealogy volunteer work do you do?
Genealogy is like a jigsaw puzzle, but you don't have the box top, so you don't know what the picture is supposed to look like. As you start putting the puzzle together, you realize some pieces are missing, and eventually you figure out that some of the pieces you started with don't actually belong to this puzzle. I'll help you discover the right pieces for your puzzle and assemble them into a picture of your family.
Showing posts with label records access. Show all posts
Showing posts with label records access. Show all posts
Sunday, October 13, 2019
Wednesday, August 22, 2018
FGS Conference: Librarians' Day and Society Day
So I was lucky enough to win a registration to this year's FGS conference, and here I am in Fort Wayne, Indiana! (The last time I was here was 24 years ago, when I still worked full time in the adventure game industry.) Librarians' Day and Society Day fall on the Tuesday and Wednesday preceding the main part of the conference, and I learn a lot at these days also.
The highlights of Librarians' Day were a presentation by Matthew LaFlash about Omeka, an open-source content management system that is being used to put all sorts of great information online (Newberry Library's Transcribing Modern Mauscripts, the Bracero History Archive, and Ohio Civil War 150, for example), and a rollicking but informative panel discussion titled "Hit Me with Your Best Shot", where speakers including Allen County Public Library's Curt Witcher and FamilySearch's David Rencher (newly named as director of the Family History Library) took any and all questions from attendees. (Rencher reminded us several times that everything on FamilySearch is still free.) Some of the topics covered:
• The importance of labeling photos and what to do if they aren't. Even if photos aren't labeled, you can still look at the context, such as signs, geography (mountains, lakes), dateable items such as cars, etc. to garner information about them. Recording the provenance is very important, as that might provide context also.
• The best method for scanning photos (this was actually answered by a professional in the photography business who was in attendance): Scan at the highest resolution that is practical (300 minimum, 600 better, and 1200 if you have the storage space) and save in TIF format. As a corollary, saving files in at least three locations was also brought up (because Lots Of Copies Keeps Stuff Safe [LOCKSS]).
• The confusion surrounding which files on FamilySearch.org are available in which locations. An icon identifies whether images must be viewed at a Family History Center or affiliate library, but nothing differentiates between which of those can be seen *only* at a Family History Center and not at the affiliates. The good news is that almost everything that is restricted can be viewed at both, but no solution right now to let you know quickly which can't.
• Limited hours at several Family History Centers. Family History Centers are governed locally, and not all of them are able to provide enough volunteers to be open more regular hours. Because of this, FamilySearch has been expanding the affiliate library program (currently at more than 400 libraries), so that restricted digitized images can be more widely available.
• Which microfilms from the Family History Library are digitized first. Part of what helps decide the priority of films to be digitized is based on the rights negotiations that FamilySearch holds with the original records holders. Digitizing films more quickly can make further negotiations go more smoothly, both for more digitization and more records. (That doesn't explain all of it, of course, but it was nice to hear some reasoning.)
• What to do when newspapers no longer sell microfilm for archival purposes but refer libraries to online subscription options. This one had no good answer. Because microfilm has become so expensive, it isn't a viable option for many companies anymore. Unfortunately, online subscriptions leave the libraries (and everyone else!) owning nothing, so when you drop the subscription, you have nothing to show (like Microsoft and its online Office 365 software). You are essentially only "renting" your access. We were told that the Sacramento Public Library paid more than $1 million to have the Sacramento Bee digitized from microfilm that it provided (but were not told which aggregator stuck it to them). This situation is only going to become worse, and the large information aggregators (ProQuest, NewsBank) will be holding libraries hostage.
• Where to share copies of family histories, research, photographs, etc. Share them everywhere that they could be considered relevant: Allen County Public Library, FamilySearch, local genealogical and historical societies, Internet Archive, ethnic societies, and anywhere else you can think of. Always check with the repository first to make sure it will accept a copy (whether physical or digital), but the more places the information is available, the better the chances that someone who is interested will find it.
And a couple of comments from Curt Witcher: We should all be trying to pursue, preserve, and present stories. And facilities always appreciate feedback from visitors. Think about the latter the next time you go to an archive or library — offer feedback before you leave!
Librarians' Day ended with a behind-the-scenes tour of some parts of the Allen County Public Library (ACPL): the Genealogy Materials Handling Unit (intake and assessment of donations), FamilySearch Book Scanning (a partnership with ACPL), Internet Archive (another partnership with ACPL), and the Lincoln Collection Library and Fine Book Room. It was so interesting to get insight into how donations are processed, see ongoing scanning of public-domain books, and view many original Abraham-Lincoln-era photographs, letters, and newspapers.
Wednesday was Society Day, with sessions geared to those of us in leadership and volunteer positions in genealogical societies. I attended a session on how to apply business management principles to society procedures and processes, and one on leadership and conflict resolution. Both had a lot of useful information I will be taking back to the societies with which I am involved.
In between those two sessions I went to the annual FGS meeting, attending as the delegate of the San Francisco Bay Area Jewish Genealogical Society. I had received notices about the meeting and had been wondering why no agenda was distributed beforehand. That question was soon answered. The entire annual meeting took three minutes. The agenda was shown on a screen and was approved by voice vote. The treasurer said that the society had been audited and was in good financial standing, with no details. No announcements were made, and the meeting was adjourned. I'm not sure why delegates are even encouraged to attend.
The final event I attended on Society Day was the presentation by Judy Russell, the Legal Genealogist. Titled "Preserving the Past, Protecting the Future", Judy's talk focused on the attacks that have been made over the past several years on records access and facilities budgets. Citing circumstances such as the loss of the most recent three years of the Social Security Death Index, New York City's decision to severely restrict birth records (older than 125 years) and death records (older than 75 records), and the encroachment of the Right to Be Forgotten into far too many areas (including a proposed Indiana law that would allow the total destruction of someone's criminal records, leaving no trace that the crime ever occurred), she declared that it is the calling of genealogists to serve as guardians of history.
And how do we do that? We need to stay informed, join together, and reach out. You can stay informed by signing up for notifications from the IAJGS Public Records Access Alerts List, which sends out announcements related to access to public records. You can also stay informed about the activities of the Records Preservation & Access Committee, a joint venture between several genealogical groups, which monitors records access issues.
Joining together has been effective in several instances of keeping repositories open and reopening facilities that have been closed. And efforts to reach out should include a broad range of individuals, such as archivists, librarians historians, the news media, and medical researchers.
In Judy's words, we all need to pitch in, speak up, and meet up. I took my first step tonight. I've written to RPAC, asking how I can help. What will you do?
The highlights of Librarians' Day were a presentation by Matthew LaFlash about Omeka, an open-source content management system that is being used to put all sorts of great information online (Newberry Library's Transcribing Modern Mauscripts, the Bracero History Archive, and Ohio Civil War 150, for example), and a rollicking but informative panel discussion titled "Hit Me with Your Best Shot", where speakers including Allen County Public Library's Curt Witcher and FamilySearch's David Rencher (newly named as director of the Family History Library) took any and all questions from attendees. (Rencher reminded us several times that everything on FamilySearch is still free.) Some of the topics covered:
• The importance of labeling photos and what to do if they aren't. Even if photos aren't labeled, you can still look at the context, such as signs, geography (mountains, lakes), dateable items such as cars, etc. to garner information about them. Recording the provenance is very important, as that might provide context also.
• The best method for scanning photos (this was actually answered by a professional in the photography business who was in attendance): Scan at the highest resolution that is practical (300 minimum, 600 better, and 1200 if you have the storage space) and save in TIF format. As a corollary, saving files in at least three locations was also brought up (because Lots Of Copies Keeps Stuff Safe [LOCKSS]).
• The confusion surrounding which files on FamilySearch.org are available in which locations. An icon identifies whether images must be viewed at a Family History Center or affiliate library, but nothing differentiates between which of those can be seen *only* at a Family History Center and not at the affiliates. The good news is that almost everything that is restricted can be viewed at both, but no solution right now to let you know quickly which can't.
• Limited hours at several Family History Centers. Family History Centers are governed locally, and not all of them are able to provide enough volunteers to be open more regular hours. Because of this, FamilySearch has been expanding the affiliate library program (currently at more than 400 libraries), so that restricted digitized images can be more widely available.
• Which microfilms from the Family History Library are digitized first. Part of what helps decide the priority of films to be digitized is based on the rights negotiations that FamilySearch holds with the original records holders. Digitizing films more quickly can make further negotiations go more smoothly, both for more digitization and more records. (That doesn't explain all of it, of course, but it was nice to hear some reasoning.)
• What to do when newspapers no longer sell microfilm for archival purposes but refer libraries to online subscription options. This one had no good answer. Because microfilm has become so expensive, it isn't a viable option for many companies anymore. Unfortunately, online subscriptions leave the libraries (and everyone else!) owning nothing, so when you drop the subscription, you have nothing to show (like Microsoft and its online Office 365 software). You are essentially only "renting" your access. We were told that the Sacramento Public Library paid more than $1 million to have the Sacramento Bee digitized from microfilm that it provided (but were not told which aggregator stuck it to them). This situation is only going to become worse, and the large information aggregators (ProQuest, NewsBank) will be holding libraries hostage.
• Where to share copies of family histories, research, photographs, etc. Share them everywhere that they could be considered relevant: Allen County Public Library, FamilySearch, local genealogical and historical societies, Internet Archive, ethnic societies, and anywhere else you can think of. Always check with the repository first to make sure it will accept a copy (whether physical or digital), but the more places the information is available, the better the chances that someone who is interested will find it.
And a couple of comments from Curt Witcher: We should all be trying to pursue, preserve, and present stories. And facilities always appreciate feedback from visitors. Think about the latter the next time you go to an archive or library — offer feedback before you leave!
Librarians' Day ended with a behind-the-scenes tour of some parts of the Allen County Public Library (ACPL): the Genealogy Materials Handling Unit (intake and assessment of donations), FamilySearch Book Scanning (a partnership with ACPL), Internet Archive (another partnership with ACPL), and the Lincoln Collection Library and Fine Book Room. It was so interesting to get insight into how donations are processed, see ongoing scanning of public-domain books, and view many original Abraham-Lincoln-era photographs, letters, and newspapers.
![]() |
| Internet Archive scanning in progress |
Wednesday was Society Day, with sessions geared to those of us in leadership and volunteer positions in genealogical societies. I attended a session on how to apply business management principles to society procedures and processes, and one on leadership and conflict resolution. Both had a lot of useful information I will be taking back to the societies with which I am involved.
In between those two sessions I went to the annual FGS meeting, attending as the delegate of the San Francisco Bay Area Jewish Genealogical Society. I had received notices about the meeting and had been wondering why no agenda was distributed beforehand. That question was soon answered. The entire annual meeting took three minutes. The agenda was shown on a screen and was approved by voice vote. The treasurer said that the society had been audited and was in good financial standing, with no details. No announcements were made, and the meeting was adjourned. I'm not sure why delegates are even encouraged to attend.
The final event I attended on Society Day was the presentation by Judy Russell, the Legal Genealogist. Titled "Preserving the Past, Protecting the Future", Judy's talk focused on the attacks that have been made over the past several years on records access and facilities budgets. Citing circumstances such as the loss of the most recent three years of the Social Security Death Index, New York City's decision to severely restrict birth records (older than 125 years) and death records (older than 75 records), and the encroachment of the Right to Be Forgotten into far too many areas (including a proposed Indiana law that would allow the total destruction of someone's criminal records, leaving no trace that the crime ever occurred), she declared that it is the calling of genealogists to serve as guardians of history.
And how do we do that? We need to stay informed, join together, and reach out. You can stay informed by signing up for notifications from the IAJGS Public Records Access Alerts List, which sends out announcements related to access to public records. You can also stay informed about the activities of the Records Preservation & Access Committee, a joint venture between several genealogical groups, which monitors records access issues.
Joining together has been effective in several instances of keeping repositories open and reopening facilities that have been closed. And efforts to reach out should include a broad range of individuals, such as archivists, librarians historians, the news media, and medical researchers.
In Judy's words, we all need to pitch in, speak up, and meet up. I took my first step tonight. I've written to RPAC, asking how I can help. What will you do?
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
The Frustrating Fate of the Record Books of the Jews from Egypt
This article originally appeared in the October 2016 edition of Kosher Koala, the journal of the Australian Jewish Genealogical Society. It is reprinted with permission from the author to help spread word about the situation with these records.
Dani Haski, guest author
In July 2016, the newspaper Egypt Independent reported the death of Lucy Saul. Saul’s passing reduced the official Jewish population of Cairo to just six old and increasingly frail women. In an interview with the BBC a couple of years ago, Magda Haroun, the nominal head of the Cairo Jewish community, voiced her anguish at what would happen to the cultural legacy of this once thriving community. Unfortunately, Mrs. Haroun proved to be just as resistant as her predecessor, the late, formidable Carmen Weinstein, when it came to facilitating access to the large library of community registers housed in the various synagogues to those who have been fighting for decades to preserve this rich heritage, so her lamentations were somewhat disingenuous.
Then, in early April 2016, Mrs. Haroun gave the libraries of the Adly, Ben Ezra, and Abbasseya synagogues, in their entirety, to the National Archives of Egypt. She did this without consulting any of the organizations which had been fighting to digitize and preserve these records. Upon receiving these assets in Cairo, officials from the National Archives descended on the community in Alexandria, which had shown no such desire to surrender its heritage. M. Ben Gaon, the community leader, was pressured to hand over its collections to the archives as well. These included personal religious and civil identity registers dating back to 1830. Placing these records with the Egyptian Archives has not so far improved access. Those fighting to save them are concerned that the records will simply disappear into this vast collection, much like the Ark of the Covenant at the end of the Hollywood movie Raiders of the Lost Ark, never to be seen again.
Egypt and the Jewish people have a history going back to before Moses. In more recent times, Egypt was home to a thriving and successful Jewish community, numbering more than 80,000 through the 19th and the first half of the 20th centuries. In synagogues across the country, the day-to-day lives of the community—births, bris and bar mitzvahs, marriages, divorces, and deaths—were dutifully recorded by hand in hundreds of leather-bound registers. No one foresaw the tumultuous turn the 20th century would take. Sadly, after World War II and with the creation of the State of Israel in 1948, the fall of the monarchy, and the Suez crisis in the 1950’s, the community was forced into what many today call the Second Exodus.
For individuals with roots in Egypt, it has been an increasingly frustrating and difficult exercise to access those vital genealogical records, records which are more than historical curiosities and can actually be crucial in matters of religious identity—often being the only way some people can verify their Jewish status for religious purposes.
The Association Internationale Nebi Daniel, based in France, has been working tirelessly for years for the opportunity to access, digitize, and preserve these record books. It was close to success in 2010, having secured a letter from the then Culture Minister, M. Farouk Hosni, acknowledging the legitimacy of its claim.
And then came Tahrir Square. The Arab Spring in Egypt threw the whole project back to square one. Hopes were once again raised with the downfall of the Muslim Brotherhood administration, but after fruitless attempts to revive negotiations through official channels, Yves Fedida, from Nebi Daniel and the Heritage of Jews in Egypt Facebook page, initiated a Change.org petition addressed directly to President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and the current Minister of Culture, M. Helmy Namnam, exhorting them to urgently authorize:
The main concern of Egyptian authorities appears to be a perceived threat of reparations being demanded by descendants of Jews who were expelled and whose businesses and properties were confiscated. The reality is that none of the registers in question has any connection to property ownership and cannot be used for this purpose. Separate cases for reparations have already been prosecuted in the Egyptian courts and settled by individuals. There is, in fact, no good reason to withhold permission for access to, and preservation of, these records, particularly when Nebi Daniel has committed to footing the bill for the whole exercise, ensuring positive PR and media coverage for the Egyptian government, and leaving the physical registers in Egypt.
The Egyptian government is not blind to the value of its Jewish cultural heritage. In 2010, the government invested almost 8.5 million Egyptian pounds (US $950,000) in restoring the Maimonides Synagogue in Cairo and opening it to the public as a museum.
As recently as early September this year, a report in Al Monitor quoted the current head of the Islamic and Coptic Monuments Department at the Ministry of Antiquities (who is also responsible for Jewish antiquities), M. Saeed Helmy, as saying, “I know very well that the Egyptian monuments—including the Jewish antiquities—capture the attention of people all around the world. Therefore, I’d like to make it clear that Egypt pays considerable attention to its monuments, whether they are Islamic, Coptic or Christian .
. . . However, we need the support of the countries that are interested in cultural heritage in order to protect these great antiquities.”
Collection of the Jewish community registers might have been an unwritten part of this response, as on June 11, the Ministry announced the formation of a special committee, with Helmy as its chair, to take stock of Jewish antiquities and register them in the ministry’s records—an activity undertaken several times already by previous Antiquities ministers. But he admitted that, with the drastic fall in tourism revenue, the country had scarce funds to achieve its goals.
But should the community registers be classified as antiquities or as artifacts? Their importance lies more in the information they contain than in the physical books themselves. Unfortunately, the Ministry has consistently ignored repeated offers of financial assistance from Association Internationale Nebi Daniel specifically to preserve these books and to help raise money for other preservation activities. It appears that this very public show of attention to part of Egypt’s recent history might simply, once again, be mere lip service, as it coincided with Helmy’s meeting with the U.S. cultural attaché in August 2016.
So what is to be done?
Egypt claims it wants to preserve these artifacts and records but cannot afford to. Members of the diaspora have repeatedly offered to help raise money and to pay for the preservation, digitizing, and indexing of important community registers, on the proviso that these records are available to the international community.
Are the Egyptian authorities deaf? Have the messages been lost in translation?
Or is the Egyptian government simply telling the international community what it wants to hear while continuing to do absolutely nothing?
Disclaimer: My father was a refugee from Egypt. I have a personal stake in wanting to access his records, along with those of his parents and grandparents, so that I can understand more of my family’s history.
©2016 Dani Haski. All rights reserved.
Dani Haski, guest author
![]() |
| Community registers in Alexandria. Photo credit: Association Internationale Nebi Daniel |
Then, in early April 2016, Mrs. Haroun gave the libraries of the Adly, Ben Ezra, and Abbasseya synagogues, in their entirety, to the National Archives of Egypt. She did this without consulting any of the organizations which had been fighting to digitize and preserve these records. Upon receiving these assets in Cairo, officials from the National Archives descended on the community in Alexandria, which had shown no such desire to surrender its heritage. M. Ben Gaon, the community leader, was pressured to hand over its collections to the archives as well. These included personal religious and civil identity registers dating back to 1830. Placing these records with the Egyptian Archives has not so far improved access. Those fighting to save them are concerned that the records will simply disappear into this vast collection, much like the Ark of the Covenant at the end of the Hollywood movie Raiders of the Lost Ark, never to be seen again.
Egypt and the Jewish people have a history going back to before Moses. In more recent times, Egypt was home to a thriving and successful Jewish community, numbering more than 80,000 through the 19th and the first half of the 20th centuries. In synagogues across the country, the day-to-day lives of the community—births, bris and bar mitzvahs, marriages, divorces, and deaths—were dutifully recorded by hand in hundreds of leather-bound registers. No one foresaw the tumultuous turn the 20th century would take. Sadly, after World War II and with the creation of the State of Israel in 1948, the fall of the monarchy, and the Suez crisis in the 1950’s, the community was forced into what many today call the Second Exodus.
For individuals with roots in Egypt, it has been an increasingly frustrating and difficult exercise to access those vital genealogical records, records which are more than historical curiosities and can actually be crucial in matters of religious identity—often being the only way some people can verify their Jewish status for religious purposes.
![]() |
| Yves Fedida (left) of Nebi Daniel with M. Farouk Hosni, former Egyptian Minister for Culture, in 2010. Photo credit: Association Internationale Nebi Daniel |
And then came Tahrir Square. The Arab Spring in Egypt threw the whole project back to square one. Hopes were once again raised with the downfall of the Muslim Brotherhood administration, but after fruitless attempts to revive negotiations through official channels, Yves Fedida, from Nebi Daniel and the Heritage of Jews in Egypt Facebook page, initiated a Change.org petition addressed directly to President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and the current Minister of Culture, M. Helmy Namnam, exhorting them to urgently authorize:
- scanning of all existing Jewish archives, particularly religious and civil identity records, and making the scans freely available;
- donation to various Jewish community synagogues across the world of some of the 150 Torah scrolls which fall outside the 100 years Egyptian Antiquities rule;
- restoration of the existing synagogues and cemeteries—in particular, the Bassatine cemetery in Cairo, one of the oldest Jewish cemeteries in the world—giving easy access both virtually and on the spot;
- development of a comprehensive inventory of the remaining communal assets and of a plan for their preservation; and
- creation, within one of the existing synagogues, of a museum of Egyptian Jewish heritage, which would encourage tourism.
The main concern of Egyptian authorities appears to be a perceived threat of reparations being demanded by descendants of Jews who were expelled and whose businesses and properties were confiscated. The reality is that none of the registers in question has any connection to property ownership and cannot be used for this purpose. Separate cases for reparations have already been prosecuted in the Egyptian courts and settled by individuals. There is, in fact, no good reason to withhold permission for access to, and preservation of, these records, particularly when Nebi Daniel has committed to footing the bill for the whole exercise, ensuring positive PR and media coverage for the Egyptian government, and leaving the physical registers in Egypt.
The Egyptian government is not blind to the value of its Jewish cultural heritage. In 2010, the government invested almost 8.5 million Egyptian pounds (US $950,000) in restoring the Maimonides Synagogue in Cairo and opening it to the public as a museum.
As recently as early September this year, a report in Al Monitor quoted the current head of the Islamic and Coptic Monuments Department at the Ministry of Antiquities (who is also responsible for Jewish antiquities), M. Saeed Helmy, as saying, “I know very well that the Egyptian monuments—including the Jewish antiquities—capture the attention of people all around the world. Therefore, I’d like to make it clear that Egypt pays considerable attention to its monuments, whether they are Islamic, Coptic or Christian .
. . . However, we need the support of the countries that are interested in cultural heritage in order to protect these great antiquities.”
Collection of the Jewish community registers might have been an unwritten part of this response, as on June 11, the Ministry announced the formation of a special committee, with Helmy as its chair, to take stock of Jewish antiquities and register them in the ministry’s records—an activity undertaken several times already by previous Antiquities ministers. But he admitted that, with the drastic fall in tourism revenue, the country had scarce funds to achieve its goals.
![]() |
| Community registers in Alexandria. Photo credit: Association Internationale Nebi Daniel |
So what is to be done?
Egypt claims it wants to preserve these artifacts and records but cannot afford to. Members of the diaspora have repeatedly offered to help raise money and to pay for the preservation, digitizing, and indexing of important community registers, on the proviso that these records are available to the international community.
Are the Egyptian authorities deaf? Have the messages been lost in translation?
Or is the Egyptian government simply telling the international community what it wants to hear while continuing to do absolutely nothing?
Disclaimer: My father was a refugee from Egypt. I have a personal stake in wanting to access his records, along with those of his parents and grandparents, so that I can understand more of my family’s history.
©2016 Dani Haski. All rights reserved.
Sunday, April 3, 2016
The Solano County Archives Are in Indefinite Storage
![]() |
| archival documents on shrink-wrapped wooden carts |
Well, I have learned that the divorce shows up in the index for civil cases from the Superior Court. I learned that Emma first filed for divorce in 1906, prior to when she paid Emile Petit to stay out of her life forever. And that seems to be as far as it can go right now, because I also learned that the Solano County Archives is in a state of limbo. Above is a photograph of the current status of the archives, according to information on the Solano County Historical Society site.
I sent an official request for records retrieval. The Solano County employee who responded to my request said that the documents just can't be found. They might be lost, they might be misfiled, they might be in a box where someone can't read the numbers because they're on a shrink-wrapped cart — oh, wait, that last one was not one of the reasons the employee cited. That's my own suggestion after looking at the photograph.
At this point Solano County apparently has no idea of when the question of what will happen to its archival materials will be resolved. I was told it could take "several months" but no specific timeline.
These archival documents go back to 1850. That's definitely worth preserving! Some people in Solano County believe an official county archive should be established and now have an online petition to try to accomplish that.
To be fair, there is at least one more side to the story. One person has put forth that Solano County has higher priorities than funding an archive. That individual wrote to me that archival requests number no more than one per month, although no basis for the statistic was given. That sounds rather low to me, considering the explosion of interest in family history that has taken over this country (remember, it's now the second highest Internet topic, right behind porn!). The person in question did not state where knowledge of the situation came from and did not list any affiliation with the archives.
I have to admit I probably lean more toward hoping the county can have its own archives. In theory it might be possible for the Solano County documents to be incorporated into the holdings of the California State Archives, but there's no guarantee that the state is willing or able to take on the additional material, and no indication that the idea has been broached to the state at all. In addition, it would mean that local residents would have to go out of the county to research their own area. My opinion holds little weight here, however, because I don't live in Solano County. Residents of Solano County need to let their opinions be known to the county Board of Supervisors as soon as possible, whichever side of the debate they are on, because the board might make a decision as early as June. Until the issue is resolved, research into the history of Solano County appears to be derailed.
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Urgent: An Archive in Danger
![]() |
| How some of the archival materials are currently being stored |
Please read more details about this situation and sign the online petition calling on the Port and the Los Angeles Harbor Commission to preserve the archives.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)







